✠ daily readings

jump to a date

readings are available from 2025-01-01 through 2027-12-31.

search

search by feast, season, or scripture reference.

type to search…

←
Lectionary 266 · Sundays and Solemnities — Easter

Octave of Easter – Saturday

→
USCCB ↗

First Reading · Acts 4:13-21

13Now seeing the constancy of Peter and of John, understanding that they were illiterate and ignorant men, they wondered: and they knew them that they had been with Jesus.14Seeing the man also who had been healed, standing with them, they could say nothing against it.15But they commanded them to go aside out of the council: and they conferred among themselves,16Saying: What shall we do to these men? For indeed a miracle hath been done by them, known to all the inhabitants of Jerusalem. It is manifest: and we cannot deny it.17But that it may be no farther spread among the people, let us threaten them that they speak no more in this name to any man.18And calling them, they charged them not to speak at all, nor teach in the name of Jesus.19But Peter and John answering, said to them: If it be just, in the sight of God, to hear you rather than God, judge ye.20For we cannot but speak the things which we have seen and heard.21But they, threatening, sent them away, not finding how they might punish them, because of the people: for all men glorified what had been done, in that which had come to pass.

commentary

The Douay's illiterate and ignorant men (v. 13) is harsher in English than the words behind it. The apparatus in Witham's note gives sine literis, agrammateis — men without letters, without formal schooling — and idiotæ, idiotai, which it glosses plebeii: private persons, commoners, men of no public standing. Neither term touches intelligence. What astonished the council, on Witham's reading, was the combination: they admired the apostles' grasp of the Scriptures precisely because these were men with no training in them, and could not find any way to contradict the fact, since the man who had been healed was standing there in the room. Haydock draws the before-and-after sharply. The same men were simple, unlettered and timorous until the coming of the Holy Ghost; the constancy on display here is not the flowering of a temperament but a change in it.

The scene's real balance of power is not where the seating suggests. Chrysostom observes that the judges were perplexed and in greater fear than the prisoners, and reduced, as Witham puts it, to threatening men against whom they could establish nothing. Peter and John close the argument by handing it back: they ask whether it is just in the sight of God to hear men rather than God, and leave the council to give the verdict on itself (v. 19). Their ground is not a claim to authority but to testimony — we cannot but speak the things which we have seen and heard. Haydock marks v. 21 as the opening of something long: here begins the history of the first persecution of religious opinion, which human passion has since swelled to a frightful length, and which on this occasion as on every other defeated its own purpose by adding firmness and constancy to the persecuted. Truth, he concludes, is not to be overpowered by violence. Gregory the Great had already put the principle in a sentence, rebuking Christians at Rome who wanted the city's Jews compelled to convert: that is an unheard-of kind of preaching which exacts belief by stripes.

Haydock lets Fénelon state the modern form of the same error, in a letter to Prince Charles: no human power can force the impenetrable entrenchments of the human mind, and compulsion never persuades, it only makes hypocrites. When kings interfere in matters of religion they do not protect it but enslave it; the remedy is civil liberty for all — not by holding all religions indifferent, but by permitting in others what God permits. The opposite failure is quieter, and Chrysostom names it from this same verse. Coming home from the theatre or any public entertainment, he says, everyone can relate what he has seen and heard; coming home from the church, where they went to be instructed, they remember nothing, repeat nothing, turn no thought back on what took place — all is silence. The apostles are on trial for the opposite condition. They have seen something and cannot stop saying so, and the proof of it is standing beside them on two working legs while the council withdraws to decide how to keep the story from spreading.

· sources ·

The complete public-domain commentary this reading's note draws from, unabridged. Every claim in the note traces to a passage here.

First Reading Acts 4:13-21

Haydock Catholic Bible Commentary · Public Domain
4:13 · bibliography — editions & variants cited above

The constancy of Peter and John, surprised the council very much. They admired their knowledge of the Scriptures, seeing them men without learning or letters,[2] and (as they are called idiots) they could not find how to contradict the fact, the man that was healed, being there present. (Witham) --- Here, with the Jewish people, you may admire the constancy, wisdom, and learning of the apostles, after the coming of the Holy Ghost, who, before that event, were simple, unlettered, and timorous men. See ver. 19; and again, Chap. v. 29.

Sine literis, Greek: agrammateis. Idiotæ, Greek: idiotai, plebeii.

4:16

What shall we do to these men? They were perplexed, says St. John Chrysostom, and in greater fear than the apostles. They saw they could do nothing but threaten and charge them to speak no more of Jesus. (Witham)

4:19

But Peter and John stopped their mouths, by asking them, if it was reasonable for them to hearken to men rather than to God. For we, they say, (ver. 20.) cannot but speak the things which we have seen and heard. (Witham)

4:20

We have seen and heard. From these words, St. John Chrysostom make some important remarks on the conduct of Christians. On returning from the theatre, or any public meeting, each can relate what he has seen and heard. This is the fruit they reap from attending at public places an amusement; and would to God it were merely pleasure unmixed with poison. But on returning from Church, where they have been for instruction, they remember nothing, speak of nothing they have seen or heard. All is silence. Not even a thought is turned on what has been performed. (Hom. x. in Act.) --- It is a curious fact, which the apologists for the innocence of modern plays would do well to attend to, that the theatre has always been avoided by the good and the virtuous of every age. When one of the ancient Fathers was exorcising a female demoniac, who had been possessed at the theatre, and bade the devil to depart; No, replied he, I had a right to take possession of her, for I found her in my own house. (Haydock)

4:21

Threatening them. Here commences the history of the first persecution of religious opinion, which the passions of men have continued, and swelled to such a frightful length. But on this, as on all other occasions, it has defeated its own purpose, by adding firmness and constancy to the persecuted. Truth is not to be overpowered by violence. In vain have the kings and princes of the earth risen up against the Lord, and against his Christ. --- When will men learn, that charity is the principle of conversion! --- That is an unheard-of kind of preaching, said the great Pope, St. Gregory, which exacts belief by stripes. He was on this occasion reprehending the false zeal of certain indiscreet Christians at Rome, who were for compelling the Jews to become converts. (Haydock) --- The amiable Fenelon, in a letter to Prince Charles, the son of our James the Second, says: "No human power can force the impenetrable intrenchments of the human mind. Compulsion never persuades---it only makes hypocrites. When kings interfere in matters of religion, they do not protect it; they enslave it. Give civil liberty to all; not by approving all religions, as indifferent, but, by permitting in others, what God permits."