✠ daily readings

jump to a date

readings are available from 2025-01-01 through 2027-12-31.

search

search by feast, season, or scripture reference.

type to search…

←
Lectionary 479 · Year II · Weekdays in Ordinary Time — Year II

Monday of the 30th week in Ordinary Time

→
USCCB ↗

First Reading · Ephesians 4:32–5:8

Ephesians 4

32And be ye kind one to another: merciful, forgiving one another, even as God hath forgiven you in Christ.

Ephesians 5

1Be ye therefore followers of God, as most dear children:2And walk in love, as Christ also hath loved us and hath delivered himself for us, an oblation and a sacrifice to God for an odour of sweetness.3But fornication and all uncleanness or covetousness, let it not so much as be named among you, as becometh saints:4Or obscenity or foolish talking or scurrility, which is to no purpose: but rather giving of thanks.5For know you this and understand: That no fornicator or unclean or covetous person (which is a serving of idols) hath inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God.6Let no man deceive you with vain words. For because of these things cometh the anger of God upon the children of unbelief.7Be ye not therefore partakers with them.8For you were heretofore darkness, but now light in the Lord. Walk then as children of the light.

commentary

Two words here were fought over long before they were translated. The first is covetousness (v. 3), Latin avaritia, Greek pleonexia. Witham reports St. Jerome expounding it "of an insatiable lust, as to the sins of uncleanness and impurity" — which would explain why Paul sets it beside fornication and uncleanness rather than among the sins of money — and notes that the Greek word may signify any unsatiable desire whatever. Chrysostom refuses the widening. He takes pleonexia at 4:19 and here as avarice, "an immoderate desire of riches" (chrematon), and holds that Christ condemned exactly this at Luke xvi. 13: you cannot serve God and mammon. On verse 5 he presses harder, reading pleonektes, hos estin eidololatres — the covetous man who is an idolater — of the avaricious man properly so called, "who adores mammon, or riches, who takes pains to leave an inheritance to others, and deprives himself of it": men chruso douleuontes, enslaved to gold.

The second word is eutrapelia, the scurrility of verse 4, and here the disagreement runs between Chrysostom and the schools. Chrysostom's description, which Witham quotes at length, is ferocious: "Where there is filthiness, there is eutrapelia. It is this that makes the mind effeminate.... Far be it from a Christian to play the comedian. If this were commendable, why is it left to buffoons?" He assigns it to flattering hangers-on, to fools in a play, to the debauched, and concludes that "if any man be void of honour, void of shame, such a one is given to eutrapelia" — meaning, Witham glosses, jests with a double meaning and raillery against the rules of good conversation, in a man "who must give an account to God of all his words." Aristotle and Aquinas take the same word the other way: an innocent, facetious jesting that carries instructive admonition, which Aquinas will reckon among the moral virtues. Witham does not force the two together, observing only that even Aristotle requires such jesting be free of immodesty and buffoonery, "otherwise it degenerates into scurrility." Both quarrels land in the same place: neither word names an act that could be tallied. Pleonexia is what a man serves; eutrapelia is what he becomes. That is why Estius hears verse 6 as a warning about the general judgment, and marks the escalation in it: Paul had already said such men have no inheritance in the kingdom, and now adds that the severest punishments will be inflicted on them.

Chrysostom's complaint has an obvious modern shape, and it is not the crude joke. It is the settled assumption that nothing need be said straight — that irony is the safe register for everything, and a man who speaks without a double meaning has simply misread the room. Paul's charge against it is bluntly practical, which is to no purpose (v. 4), and his replacement is stranger than a prohibition: but rather giving of thanks, the one form of speech that cannot be performed at a distance from what it says. Estius supplies the measure of the change being demanded. Darkness was the state of infidelity in which they had gone so far as to adore stones as God; light is not a mood but "shining in faith and justice." The idolater Chrysostom describes never left the stones behind. He refined them into gold, and spends his life taking pains to leave an inheritance to others while depriving himself of it.

· sources ·

The complete public-domain commentary this reading's note draws from, unabridged. Every claim in the note traces to a passage here.

First Reading Ephesians 4:32–5:8

Haydock Catholic Bible Commentary · Public Domain
5:3 · bibliography — editions & variants cited above

Covetousness.[1] The Latin word is generally taken for a coveting or immoderate desire of money and riches. St. Jerome and others observe, that the Greek word in this an divers other places in the New Testament may signify any unsatiable desire, or the lusts of sensual pleasures; and on this account, St. Jerome thinks that it is here joined with fornication and uncleanness. But St. John Chrysostom in the last chapter, (ver. 19. hom. xiii. and on this chap. ver. 3.) shews that by the Greek word is understood avarice, or an immoderate desire of riches, when he tells (hom. xviii) that this sin is condemned by those words of Christ, Luke xvi. 13. You cannot serve God and mammon. (Witham)

and 5. Covetousness, avaritia, Greek: pleonexia. See St. Jerome on these verses, who expounds it of an insatiable lust, as to the sins of uncleanness and impurity. (p. 380.) But see also St. John Chrysostom who, by Greek: pleonexia, (Chap. iv. 19.) expounds, an immoderate desire of riches: Greek: chrematon om. ig. (p. 829.) And here, hom. xvii. p. 847, Greek: o gar auto chrematon eromen, kai somaton. And hom. xviii, on the fifth verse, he expounds the word, Greek: pleonektes, os estin eidololatres, qui est idolatra, of him who is, properly speaking, an avaricious man; who adores mammon, or riches, who takes pains to leave an inheritance to others, and deprives himself of it, &c. (p. 853.) Greek: chruso douleuontes, 851.

5:4 · bibliography — editions & variants cited above

Nor obscenity.[2] What is here meant by this word, St. John Chrysostom tells us at large in the moral exhortation after his 17th homily; to wit, jests with immodest suggestions or a double meaning, and raillery or buffoonery against the rules of good conversation, scarce made use of by any but by men of low condition and a mean genius, which is not to the purpose of a Christian, who must give an account to God of all his words. (Witham)

Scurrilitas, quæ ad rem non pertinet, Greek: eutrapelia ta oukanekonta. St. John Chrysostom, Greek: log. ig. p. 848 and 849, describes the vice of Greek: eutrapelia in these words: Greek: entha aichrotes, ekei e eutrapelia....e eutrapelia malaken poiei psuchen, &c. ...porro touto christianou, to komodein....ei kalon to pragma, ti tois mimois aphietai; ...parasiton to pragma, mimon, orcheston, gunaikon, pornon, porro psuches eleutheras, porro eugenous....ei tis aichros, outos kai eutrapelos. Where there is filthiness, there is eutrapelia. It is this that makes the mind effeminate....Far be it from a Christian to play the comedian. If this were commendable, why is it left to buffoons? It is the business of flattering hangers-on, or trencher friends, of fools in a play, of debauched women, but far be it from persons of a higher rank, well born, and of good breeding. If any man be void of honour, void of shame, such a one is given to eutrapelia. A man will scarce find it worth his while to consult the Latin translation in Fronto-Ducæus, which in this and many other places is far from being exact. I know that Aristotle, (lib. iv. de moribus. chap. 14, p. 42. Ed. Aurel. Allobrog.) and St. Thomas Aquinas, the doctor of the schools, (lib. ii. Q. 60. a. 5. and 22.; Q. 168. a. 2.) takes eutrapelia in a different sense, when it is a facetious innocent way of jesting, containing rather instructive admonitions; and so, St. Thomas Aquinas tells us, it may be reckoned among the moral virtues; but then, even as Aristotle tells us, it must be without all words of immodesty and buffoonery, which is against good manners: otherwise it degenerates into scurrility.

5:5

Nor covetous person, which is a serving of idols. It is clear enough by the Greek that the covetous man is called an idolater, whose idol in mammon; though it may be also said of other sinners, that the vices they are addicted to are their idols. (Witham)

5:6

The apostle here puts them in mind of the general judgment, when the angel of God will, on account of their crimes of avarice, fornication, &c. fall on the children of unbelief; by which are meant the wicked. He had before assured them that the perpetrators of such crimes would be excluded from the kingdom of heaven; and now he moreover informs them, that the severest punishments will be inflicted on such wicked persons. (Estius)

5:7

Be ye not, therefore, partakers with them: do not imitate their wickedness, or the wrath of the Almighty will likewise fall on you. (Estius)

5:8

By darkness is here meant the state of infidelity into which they had been plunged so far as to adore stones as God, and committed without remorse the above-mentioned grievous sins. But delivered by Christ from this darkness, they have become light in the Lord, shining in faith and justice. (Estius)