✠ daily readings

jump to a date

readings are available from 2025-01-01 through 2027-12-31.

search

search by feast, season, or scripture reference.

type to search…

←
Sat · Jan 31, 2026 · Ordinary Time

Saint John Bosco, Priest

→
USCCB ↗

First Reading · 2 Samuel 12:1-7a, 10-17

1And the Lord sent Nathan to David: and when he was come to him, he said to him: There were two men in one city, the one rich, and the other poor.2The rich man had exceeding many sheep and oxen.3But the poor man had nothing at all but one little ewe lamb, which he had bought and nourished up, and which had grown up in his house together with his children, eating of his bread, and drinking of his cup, and sleeping in his bosom: and it was unto him as a daughter.4And when a certain stranger was come to the rich man, he spared to take of his own sheep and oxen, to make a feast for that stranger, who was come to him, but took the poor man's ewe, and dressed it for the man that was come to him.5And David's anger being exceedingly kindled against that man, he said to Nathan: As the Lord liveth, the man that hath done this is a child of death.6He shall restore the ewe fourfold, because he did this thing, and had no pity.7And Nathan said to David: Thou art the man. Thus saith the Lord the God of Israel: I anointed thee king over Israel, and I delivered thee from the hand of Saul,10Therefore the sword shall never depart from thy house, because thou hast despised me, and hast taken the wife of Urias the Hethite to be thy wife.11Thus saith the Lord: Behold, I will raise up evil against thee out of thy own house, and I will take thy wives before thy eyes and give them to thy neighbour, and he shall lie with thy wives in the sight of this sun.12For thou didst it secretly: but I will do this thing in the sight of all Israel, and in the sight of the sun.13And David said to Nathan: I have sinned against the Lord. And Nathan said to David: The Lord also hath taken away thy sin: thou shalt not die.14Nevertheless, because thou hast given occasion to the enemies of the Lord to blaspheme, for this thing, the child that is born to thee, shall surely die.15And Nathan returned to his house. The Lord also struck the child which the wife of Urias had borne to David, and his life was despaired of.16And David besought the Lord for the child: and David kept a fast, and going in by himself lay upon the ground.17And the ancients of his house came, to make him rise from the ground: but he would not, neither did he eat meat with them.

commentary

Nathan's parable is built to be believed. Bochart notes that in Arabia one of the finest lambs is kept in the house with the children, so the ewe sleeping in his bosom and reckoned as a daughter (v. 3) is realism rather than pathos — though Calmet cautions that not every detail need answer to Bethsabee, and Menochius adds that such stories carry ornament. Haydock supplies the one detail that does answer: Urias had her alone, where David had eighteen wives. The sentence David then passes is legally excessive, and Calmet says so — simple theft required only fourfold restitution under Exodus 22:1, and death is not in the statute; a judge may raise or lower the law's severity according to the offender's disposition, which is what the king does here, with no idea whose disposition he is assessing. The number is contested: the Septuagint reads sevenfold, where Grabe restores fourfold from the Hebrew. Calmet then counts the restitution out: David lost four sons — the child of Bethsabee, Amnon, Absalon, Adonias — and saw his daughter Thamar and ten of his wives dishonoured. The verdict was paid in full by the man who handed it down.

Calmet's account of the preceding year is the bleakest thing in the chapter. Nearly twelve months had passed, the child was born, the spirit of prophecy had left David — and he remained clear-sighted and equitable enough to punish other men's faults, unable to recognise his own portrait until Nathan drew off the veil. Hence the prophet's method: he does not accuse the king until the king has sentenced himself, which Haydock underlines with Horace's mutato nomine de te fabula narratur, change the name and the tale is told of you. Chrysostom thought the chief lords of the court were present, which would make Nathan's discretion sharper and David's submission costlier. What follows needs careful handling, and Challoner gives it: the evils announced in v. 11 come from God as punishments, which is why he says I will raise up evil against thee, but as sins on Absalom's part God is not their author and only permits them. The confession in v. 13 is four words long and identical to one that failed. Augustine, against Faustus, sets it beside Saul's I have sinned — the expression was the same, but God saw the difference of the heart. Ambrose reads the speed of the pardon as the measure of the repentance, and Calmet specifies what was granted: fault and eternal punishment remitted, temporal chastisement much reduced, the threatened death withheld.

What is not remitted is the damage done outside David. The reason given for the child's death is that the king hast given occasion to the enemies of the Lord to blaspheme (v. 14), and Haydock's comment on it is unusually contemporary. God and religion are constantly vilified on account of the misconduct of people who know better and do not live up to their profession; he judges the inference fallacious and uncandid — the failure of a believer is no argument against what he believes — while insisting that this is no comfort to the believer who supplied it. The obligation runs one way: never do the thing that alienates weak minds from the truth. David's own answer is not explanation but posture. He fasted with more than ordinary rigour — Salien takes the doubled jejunavit jejunio that way — and, as Haydock renders the Hebrew, went in and lay all night upon the ground; and when the elders of his house came to lift him up, he would not rise, and would not eat with them.

· sources ·

The complete public-domain commentary this reading's note draws from, unabridged. Every claim in the note traces to a passage here.

First Reading 2 Samuel 12:1-7a, 10-17

Haydock Catholic Bible Commentary · Public Domain
12:1

Unto him, after the birth of the child. A whole year had nearly elapsed, and David continued blind and impenitent. The spirit of prophecy had left him; and, though he was clear-sighted, and equitable enough to punish the faults of others, he could not discern his own picture, till Nathan had removed the veil. The prophet acted with the utmost prudence, and did not condemn the king till he had pronounced sentence on himself. It is commonly supposed that the interview was private. St. Chrysostom believes that the chief lords of the court were present; which would enhance the discretion of Nathan, as well as David's humility. (Calmet)

12:3

Daughter. All these expressions tended to shew the affection of the owner for this pet lamb. (Haydock) --- In Arabia, one of the finest is commonly fed in the house along with the children. (Bochart, Anim. T. i. B. ii. 46.) --- It is not necessary that every word of this parable should have been verified in Bethsabee. (Calmet) --- Many things are usually added for ornament. (Menochius) --- Yet she had been treated in the most tender manner by her husband, who had her alone, while David had eighteen wives. (Haydock)

12:4

To him. This wanton cruelty caused David to pronounce him deserving of death; as simple theft was punished with only a four-fold restitution, Exodus xxii. 1. Judges sometimes diminish, and at other times increase, the severity of the law, according to the dispositions of the offenders, which lawgivers could not exactly foresee. (Calmet)

12:6

Fold. Septuagint, "seven-fold," which Grabe corrects by the Hebrew. (Haydock) --- David lost four of his sons; the first born of Bethsabee, Amnon, Absalon, and Adonias: and saw his daughter Thamar, (Calmet) and his ten inferior wives, dishonoured, in punishment of his crime. (Menochius)

12:7

The man, against whom thou hast pronounced sentence, and who has treated thy neighbour with still less pity. (Haydock)

-----Mutato nomine de te

Fabula narratur.----- (Horace)

12:10

House. What a dismal scene opens itself to our view during the remaining part of David's reign! (Haydock) --- Scarcely one of his successors was free from war; even Solomon was disturbed by the rebellion of Jeroboam, &c., and many of David's family and descendants came to an untimely end, ver. 6. (Calmet) --- Six sons of Josaphat, all Joram's, except one, Josias, the children of Sedecias, &c., 4 Kings xxv., &c. (Worthington)

12:11

I will raise, &c. All these evils, inasmuch as they were punishments, came upon Daivd by a just judgment of God, for his sin; and therefore God says, I will raise, &c. But inas much as they were sins, on the part of Absalom and his associates, God was not the author of them, but only permitted them. (Challoner) --- God permitted the wicked prince to succeed for some time, that he might punish David. (Calmet) --- Neighbour, most dearly beloved. To be treated ill by such a one, is doubly severe, Psalm liv. 15. (Menochius)

12:12

Sun, publicly, chap. xvi. 22. How abominable soever this conduct of an unnatural son must have been to God, he says, I will do this; because, when he might have prevented it by a more powerful grace, or by the death of the delinquent, he suffered him to carry his infernal project into execution. (Haydock)

12:13

Sinned. His confession was sincere, and very different from that of Saul, 1 Kings xv. 24. "The expression was the same; but God saw the difference of the heart." (St. Augustine, contra Faust. xxii. 27.) --- Sin. He has remitted the fault and the eternal punishment, and he has greatly diminished the temporal chastisement, and will not inflict instant death, as he seemed to have threatened, ver. 10. (Calmet) --- "The speedy remission shewed the greatness of the king's repentance." (St. Ambrose, Apol. 2.)

12:14

Occasion. Literally, "made" almost, in the same sense, as God threatened to do, what was effected by Absalom, ver. 12. David did not co-operate with the malice of infidels; but he was responsible for it: in as much as he had committed an unlawful action, which gave them occasion to blaspheme God, as if he had not been able to foresee this scandalous transaction. Thus God and religion are often vilified, on account of the misconduct of those who have the happiness to be well informed, but do not live up to their profession: but this mode of argumentation is very fallacious and uncandid. It ought, however, to be a caution to the servants of the true God, never to do any thing which may have such fatal consequences; and alienate the minds of weak men for the truth. --- Die. Thus infidels would see, that God did not suffer David to pass quite unpunished. (Haydock)

12:15

Of. Hebrew, "it was sick" (Calmet) of a fever.

12:16

A fast, (jejunavit jejunio) denotes, with more than ordinary rigour. (Salien) --- By himself. Hebrew, "he went in, and lay all night upon the ground." (Haydock)