Old; about fifty. (Salien) (Calmet) --- This is an aggravation of his guilt. (Haydock) --- Solomon spent the first thirty years of his reign in virtue: but towards the termination of it, he gave into idolatry, and into such excesses, that he deserves to be ranked with Henry VIII, who began well, but ended with dishonour. (Haydock) --- Heart, and mind also, ver. 9. He sacrificed to idols, not only externally, but gave them internal worship; (Salien) so much was his understanding darkened, unless (Haydock) he acted against his better knowledge, Ecclesiastes ii. 9. (Tirinus) --- Father who did not continue long in sin. (Du Hamel) --- "The wisdom, which had been given to him, entirely abandoned his heart, which the discipline even of the smallest tribulation had not guarded." (St. Gregory, Pastoral. p. 3.) --- "He had commenced his reign with an ardent desire of wisdom, and when he had obtained it by spiritual love, he lost it by carnal affections." (St. Augustine, Doct. iii. 21.) --- "Prosperity, which is a severe trial for the wise, was more disadvantageous to him than wisdom herself had been profitable." (St. Augustine, City of God xvii. 20.) --- The Fathers do not attempt to palliate the guilt of Solomon; and those aggravate his crime, who endeavour to excuse him by saying, that his mind was still convinced that there could be but one God, and that his adoration of idols was merely external, and out of complaisance to his wives. See Santius,&c. (Calmet)
Thursday of the 5th week of Ordinary Time
First Reading — 1 Kings 11:4-13
4And when he was now old, his heart was turned away by women to follow strange gods: and his heart was not perfect with the Lord his God, as was the heart of David, his father.5But Solomon worshipped Astarthe, the goddess of the Sidonians, and Moloch, the idol of the Ammonites.6And Solomon did that which was not pleasing before the Lord, and did not fully follow the Lord, as David, his father.7Then Solomon built a temple for Chamos, the idol of Moab, on the hill that is over against Jerusalem, and for Moloch, the idol of the children of Ammon.8And he did in this manner for all his wives that were strangers, who burnt incense, and offered sacrifice to their gods.9And the Lord was angry with Solomon, because his mind was turned away from the Lord, the God of Israel, who had appeared to him twice;10And had commanded him concerning this thing, that he should not follow strange gods: but he kept not the things which the Lord commanded him.11The Lord therefore said to Solomon: Because thou hast done this, and hast not kept my covenant, and my precepts, which I have commanded thee, I will divide and rend thy kingdom, and will give it to thy servant.12Nevertheless, in thy days I will not do it, for David thy father's sake: but I will rend it out of the hand of thy son.13Neither will I take away the whole kingdom; but I will give one tribe to thy son, for the sake of David, my servant, and Jerusalem, which I have chosen.
4And when now he was old, his heart was perverted by the women, so that he followed strange gods. And his heart was not perfect with the Lord his God, as was the heart of his father David.5For Solomon worshipped Ashtoreth, the goddess of the Sidonians, and Milcom, the idol of the Ammonites.6And Solomon did what was not pleasing in the sight of the Lord. And he did not continue to follow the Lord, as his father David did.7Then Solomon built a shrine for Chemosh, the idol of Moab, on the mount that is opposite Jerusalem, and for Milcom, the idol of the sons of Ammon.8And he acted in this manner for all his foreign wives, who were burning incense and immolating to their gods.9And so, the Lord became angry with Solomon, because his mind had been turned away from the Lord, the God of Israel, who had appeared to him twice,10and who had instructed him about this matter, lest he follow strange gods. But he did not observe what the Lord commanded to him.11And so, the Lord said to Solomon: “Because you have this with you, and because you have not kept my covenant and my precepts, which I commanded to you, I will tear apart your kingdom, and I will give it to your servant.12Yet truly, I will not do it in your days, for the sake of your father David. From the hand of your son, I will tear it away.13Neither will I take away the whole kingdom. Instead, I will grant one tribe to your son, for the sake of David, my servant, and Jerusalem, which I have chosen.”
4For it came to pass, when Solomon was old, that his wives turned away his heart after other gods: and his heart was not perfect with the Lord his God, as was the heart of David his father.5For Solomon went after Ashtoreth the goddess of the Zidonians, and after Milcom the abomination of the Ammonites.6And Solomon did evil in the sight of the Lord, and went not fully after the Lord, as did David his father.7Then did Solomon build an high place for Chemosh, the abomination of Moab, in the hill that is before Jerusalem, and for Molech, the abomination of the children of Ammon.8And likewise did he for all his strange wives, which burnt incense and sacrificed unto their gods.9And the Lord was angry with Solomon, because his heart was turned from the Lord God of Israel, which had appeared unto him twice,10And had commanded him concerning this thing, that he should not go after other gods: but he kept not that which the Lord commanded.11Wherefore the Lord said unto Solomon, Forasmuch as this is done of thee, and thou hast not kept my covenant and my statutes, which I have commanded thee, I will surely rend the kingdom from thee, and will give it to thy servant.12Notwithstanding in thy days I will not do it for David thy father’s sake: but I will rend it out of the hand of thy son.13Howbeit I will not rend away all the kingdom; but will give one tribe to thy son for David my servant’s sake, and for Jerusalem’s sake which I have chosen.
4And when he was now old, his heart was turned away by women to follow strange gods: and his heart was not perfect with the Lord his God, as was the heart of David, his father.5But Solomon worshipped Astarthe, the goddess of the Sidonians, and Moloch, the idol of the Ammonites.6And Solomon did that which was not pleasing before the Lord, and did not fully follow the Lord, as David, his father.7Then Solomon built a temple for Chamos, the idol of Moab, on the hill that is over against Jerusalem, and for Moloch, the idol of the children of Ammon.8And he did in this manner for all his wives that were strangers, who burnt incense, and offered sacrifice to their gods.9And the Lord was angry with Solomon, because his mind was turned away from the Lord, the God of Israel, who had appeared to him twice;10And had commanded him concerning this thing, that he should not follow strange gods: but he kept not the things which the Lord commanded him.11The Lord therefore said to Solomon: Because thou hast done this, and hast not kept my covenant, and my precepts, which I have commanded thee, I will divide and rend thy kingdom, and will give it to thy servant.12Nevertheless, in thy days I will not do it, for David thy father's sake: but I will rend it out of the hand of thy son.13Neither will I take away the whole kingdom; but I will give one tribe to thy son, for the sake of David, my servant, and Jerusalem, which I have chosen.
4And when now he was old, his heart was perverted by the women, so that he followed strange gods. And his heart was not perfect with the Lord his God, as was the heart of his father David.5For Solomon worshipped Ashtoreth, the goddess of the Sidonians, and Milcom, the idol of the Ammonites.6And Solomon did what was not pleasing in the sight of the Lord. And he did not continue to follow the Lord, as his father David did.7Then Solomon built a shrine for Chemosh, the idol of Moab, on the mount that is opposite Jerusalem, and for Milcom, the idol of the sons of Ammon.8And he acted in this manner for all his foreign wives, who were burning incense and immolating to their gods.9And so, the Lord became angry with Solomon, because his mind had been turned away from the Lord, the God of Israel, who had appeared to him twice,10and who had instructed him about this matter, lest he follow strange gods. But he did not observe what the Lord commanded to him.11And so, the Lord said to Solomon: “Because you have this with you, and because you have not kept my covenant and my precepts, which I commanded to you, I will tear apart your kingdom, and I will give it to your servant.12Yet truly, I will not do it in your days, for the sake of your father David. From the hand of your son, I will tear it away.13Neither will I take away the whole kingdom. Instead, I will grant one tribe to your son, for the sake of David, my servant, and Jerusalem, which I have chosen.”
4For it came to pass, when Solomon was old, that his wives turned away his heart after other gods: and his heart was not perfect with the Lord his God, as was the heart of David his father.5For Solomon went after Ashtoreth the goddess of the Zidonians, and after Milcom the abomination of the Ammonites.6And Solomon did evil in the sight of the Lord, and went not fully after the Lord, as did David his father.7Then did Solomon build an high place for Chemosh, the abomination of Moab, in the hill that is before Jerusalem, and for Molech, the abomination of the children of Ammon.8And likewise did he for all his strange wives, which burnt incense and sacrificed unto their gods.9And the Lord was angry with Solomon, because his heart was turned from the Lord God of Israel, which had appeared unto him twice,10And had commanded him concerning this thing, that he should not go after other gods: but he kept not that which the Lord commanded.11Wherefore the Lord said unto Solomon, Forasmuch as this is done of thee, and thou hast not kept my covenant and my statutes, which I have commanded thee, I will surely rend the kingdom from thee, and will give it to thy servant.12Notwithstanding in thy days I will not do it for David thy father’s sake: but I will rend it out of the hand of thy son.13Howbeit I will not rend away all the kingdom; but will give one tribe to thy son for David my servant’s sake, and for Jerusalem’s sake which I have chosen.
Responsorial Psalm — Psalm 106:3-4, 35-36, 37 and 40
3Blessed are they that keep judgment, and do justice at all times.4Remember us, O Lord, in the favour of thy people: visit us with thy salvation.35And they were mingled among the heathens, and learned their works:36And served their idols, and it became a stumblingblock to them.37And they sacrificed their sons, and their daughters to devils.40And the Lord was exceedingly angry with his people: and he abhorred his inheritance.
3Blessed are those who keep judgment and who do justice at all times.4Remember us, O Lord, with good will for your people. Visit us with your salvation,35And they were mixed among the Gentiles. And they learned their works,36and they served their graven images, and it became a scandal to them.37And they sacrificed their sons and their daughters to demons.40And the Lord became furiously angry with his people, and he abhorred his inheritance.
3Blessed are they that keep judgment, and he that doeth righteousness at all times.4Remember me, O Lord, with the favour that thou bearest unto thy people: O visit me with thy salvation;35But were mingled among the heathen, and learned their works.36And they served their idols: which were a snare unto them.37Yea, they sacrificed their sons and their daughters unto devils,40Therefore was the wrath of the Lord kindled against his people, insomuch that he abhorred his own inheritance.
3Blessed are they that keep judgment, and do justice at all times.4Remember us, O Lord, in the favour of thy people: visit us with thy salvation.35And they were mingled among the heathens, and learned their works:36And served their idols, and it became a stumblingblock to them.37And they sacrificed their sons, and their daughters to devils.40And the Lord was exceedingly angry with his people: and he abhorred his inheritance.
3Blessed are those who keep judgment and who do justice at all times.4Remember us, O Lord, with good will for your people. Visit us with your salvation,35And they were mixed among the Gentiles. And they learned their works,36and they served their graven images, and it became a scandal to them.37And they sacrificed their sons and their daughters to demons.40And the Lord became furiously angry with his people, and he abhorred his inheritance.
3Blessed are they that keep judgment, and he that doeth righteousness at all times.4Remember me, O Lord, with the favour that thou bearest unto thy people: O visit me with thy salvation;35But were mingled among the heathen, and learned their works.36And they served their idols: which were a snare unto them.37Yea, they sacrificed their sons and their daughters unto devils,40Therefore was the wrath of the Lord kindled against his people, insomuch that he abhorred his own inheritance.
Blessed are they that keep judgment, and do justice at all times (v. 3) looks like one idea said twice, and Augustine takes some trouble to show that it is not. Scripture loves to pair the two words, he admits — righteousness and judgment as the seat of God's throne, righteousness brought forth as the light and judgment as the noonday — and either may stand for the other. But taken in their proper senses they differ: a man keeps judgment by judging rightly and does justice by acting rightly, so the verse blesses those who keep judgment in faith and do righteousness in deed. Haydock adds the clause that makes the demand hard, at all times: only he who perseveres to the end shall be crowned. Verse 4 carries a textual variant worth knowing. Calmet notes that the Hebrew reads remember me, in the singular, while Aquila and the Syriac agree with the Septuagint's plural — and Augustine, who has the singular before him, prays to be counted among a people God is actually pleased with, since, as he dryly observes, God is not pleased with all of them.
The middle of the reading is a diagnosis, and Augustine states its mechanism in a single sentence: their not destroying them, but mingling with them, became to them an offence. What follows is the worst of it — they sacrificed their sons, and their daughters to devils (v. 37) — and here Augustine does something unexpected. He acknowledges that the historical books do not report Israel doing this. His response is neither to explain the verse away nor to assert it flatly: the psalm cannot lie, and the prophets repeat the charge in many rebukes, and besides, the literature of the pagans is not silent about the custom. He handles the next verse with the same care. The Latin says the land was slain with bloods, which looks exactly like a copyist writing interfecta where he meant infecta, defiled — and Augustine, having inspected Greek copies and found "slain" in them, refuses the correction, taking the harder reading as it stands: they were slaying their own souls when they offered up their sons and shed the blood of infants who could not consent. The last verse gets a similar restraint. Where the Douay has God exceedingly angry, Augustine reports that translators were reluctant to render the Greek thumos as anger at all, some preferring indignation or mind, and he insists that whichever word is used, no passion touches God; the term is borrowed from human custom to name the power of punishing.
The sequence is what should be read slowly, because it does not begin with atrocity. It begins with a decision not made — the nations left in place — and proceeds to mingling, then to learning their works, then to serving what one had merely tolerated, and only then to the altar with a child on it. Every stage looks reasonable from inside the previous one. The modern shape of it is the same drift: what is at first not worth a fight becomes the ordinary way of doing things, and then becomes the thing for which the young are spent. Against that the psalm sets a prayer rather than a resolution. Augustine reads visit us with thy salvation (v. 4) as a request for a person — visit us with your Christ — because the blessedness of v. 3 is not a standard one meets but a healing one receives, God making men righteous by curing them of their iniquities. It is asked by people who have just described their inheritance being abhorred, and who are asking to be remembered anyway.
Gospel — Mark 7:24-30
24And rising from thence he went into the coasts of Tyre and Sidon: and entering into a house, he would that no man should know it. And he could not be hid.25For a woman as soon as she heard of him, whose daughter had an unclean spirit, came in and fell down at his feet.26For the woman was a Gentile, a Syrophenician born. And she besought him that he would cast forth the devil out of her daughter.27Who said to her: suffer first the children to be filled: for it is not good to take the bread of the children and cast it to the dogs.28But she answered and said to him: Yea, Lord; for the whelps also eat under the table of the crumbs of the children.29And he said to her: For this saying, go thy way. The devil is gone out of thy daughter.30And when she was come into her house, she found the girl lying upon the bed and that the devil was gone out.
24And rising up, he went from there to the area of Tyre and Sidon. And entering into a house, he intended no one to know about it, but he was not able to remain hidden.25For a woman whose daughter had an unclean spirit, as soon as she heard about him, entered and fell prostrate at his feet.26For the woman was a Gentile, by birth a Syro-Phoenician. And she petitioned him, so that he would cast the demon from her daughter.27And he said to her: “First allow the sons to have their fill. For it is not good to take away the bread of the sons and throw it to the dogs.”28But she responded by saying to him: “Certainly, Lord. Yet the young dogs also eat, under the table, from the crumbs of the children.”29And he said to her, “Because of this saying, go; the demon has gone out of your daughter.”30And when she had gone to her house, she found the girl lying on the bed; and the demon had gone away.
24And from thence he arose, and went into the borders of Tyre and Sidon, and entered into an house, and would have no man know it: but he could not be hid.25For a certain woman, whose young daughter had an unclean spirit, heard of him, and came and fell at his feet:26The woman was a Greek, a Syrophenician by nation; and she besought him that he would cast forth the devil out of her daughter.27But Jesus said unto her, Let the children first be filled: for it is not meet to take the children’s bread, and to cast it unto the dogs.28And she answered and said unto him, Yes, Lord: yet the dogs under the table eat of the children’s crumbs.29And he said unto her, For this saying go thy way; the devil is gone out of thy daughter.30And when she was come to her house, she found the devil gone out, and her daughter laid upon the bed.
24And rising from thence he went into the coasts of Tyre and Sidon: and entering into a house, he would that no man should know it. And he could not be hid.25For a woman as soon as she heard of him, whose daughter had an unclean spirit, came in and fell down at his feet.26For the woman was a Gentile, a Syrophenician born. And she besought him that he would cast forth the devil out of her daughter.27Who said to her: suffer first the children to be filled: for it is not good to take the bread of the children and cast it to the dogs.28But she answered and said to him: Yea, Lord; for the whelps also eat under the table of the crumbs of the children.29And he said to her: For this saying, go thy way. The devil is gone out of thy daughter.30And when she was come into her house, she found the girl lying upon the bed and that the devil was gone out.
24And rising up, he went from there to the area of Tyre and Sidon. And entering into a house, he intended no one to know about it, but he was not able to remain hidden.25For a woman whose daughter had an unclean spirit, as soon as she heard about him, entered and fell prostrate at his feet.26For the woman was a Gentile, by birth a Syro-Phoenician. And she petitioned him, so that he would cast the demon from her daughter.27And he said to her: “First allow the sons to have their fill. For it is not good to take away the bread of the sons and throw it to the dogs.”28But she responded by saying to him: “Certainly, Lord. Yet the young dogs also eat, under the table, from the crumbs of the children.”29And he said to her, “Because of this saying, go; the demon has gone out of your daughter.”30And when she had gone to her house, she found the girl lying on the bed; and the demon had gone away.
24And from thence he arose, and went into the borders of Tyre and Sidon, and entered into an house, and would have no man know it: but he could not be hid.25For a certain woman, whose young daughter had an unclean spirit, heard of him, and came and fell at his feet:26The woman was a Greek, a Syrophenician by nation; and she besought him that he would cast forth the devil out of her daughter.27But Jesus said unto her, Let the children first be filled: for it is not meet to take the children’s bread, and to cast it unto the dogs.28And she answered and said unto him, Yes, Lord: yet the dogs under the table eat of the children’s crumbs.29And he said unto her, For this saying go thy way; the devil is gone out of thy daughter.30And when she was come to her house, she found the devil gone out, and her daughter laid upon the bed.
The Douay calls her a Gentile, a Syrophenician born (v. 26), which is already an interpretation. Lapide notes that the Greek word is έλλήνις, a Greek woman — not an ethnic description but an imperial one, since wherever the Greeks held sway all Gentiles were called Greeks, which is why Paul can write "the Jew first, and also the Greek" and mean the Jew and everyone else. Syrophenician, her second label, marks the part of Phoenicia facing Syria. But the sentence that has always troubled readers is earlier: Jesus enters a house and would that no man should know it. And he could not be hid (v. 24). Taken flatly, the verse reports a failed intention — which is precisely the objection the commentators raise against themselves: if he wished it and could not have it, his will was under control, and that is impossible.
The answer given under Augustine's name is that the will in question was narrower than it looks. He willed not to be published by his own disciples, and willed to be sought out by these Gentiles — and that is what happened, since it was not his followers but the people who saw him enter the house who spread the news. Bede draws the lesson: in an unfamiliar region the disciples were to shrink from the glory of human praise, without ever ceasing the work when the faith of the good deserved a miracle. Augustine also reconciles Matthew, who has the woman crying after them on the road, with Mark, who has her indoors: she came to him in the house, he answered not a word, and in that silence went out, so that she followed and won her request on the way. Theophylact takes the dogs for the Gentiles as the Jews reckoned them and the bread for the benefit promised to Israel, and says the delay is deliberate — to show her faith firm, and to teach us not to tire in prayer but to persist until we obtain. Pseudo-Chrysostom insists the refusal reflects no deficiency of power, only the jealousy that would follow if the benefit went equally to two peoples with no dealings with each other. Nobody treats her answer as a clever rebuttal. Her placing herself in the rank of dogs, Pseudo-Chrysostom says, is a mark of reverence: she counts it a favour to eat as a dog does, not from some other table but from the Master's own. Theophylact hears her conceding everything — the Jews have the whole loaf, I ask only the crumbs — then makes the decisive observation about the cure. Christ did not say my virtue hath made thee whole; he said for this saying, meaning for the faith the saying disclosed.
Bede takes the case as a precedent. The devil left the daughter on account of the mother's humble and faithful words, which is why infants are catechised and baptized: freed by the faith and confession of their parents, though they can as yet neither know anything nor do good or evil. Theophylact turns the same scene inward — the soul that falls into sin is the woman, her sick daughter is her evil actions, and sinners are the dogs, unfit for the bread of God until, knowing themselves to be dogs, they confess. That is the movement pride will not perform: not asserting a right to the table, but willing to be answered slowly, in public, with a word that stings, and asking anyway. Pseudo-Jerome reads the woman as the Church and her daughter as the western nations turned from dogs into sheep. What she asks for is not the unbroken loaf of the letter. It is the crumbs of spiritual understanding, taken from under the table where the children are still eating.
First Reading · 1 Kings 11:4-13
4And when he was now old, his heart was turned away by women to follow strange gods: and his heart was not perfect with the Lord his God, as was the heart of David, his father.5But Solomon worshipped Astarthe, the goddess of the Sidonians, and Moloch, the idol of the Ammonites.6And Solomon did that which was not pleasing before the Lord, and did not fully follow the Lord, as David, his father.7Then Solomon built a temple for Chamos, the idol of Moab, on the hill that is over against Jerusalem, and for Moloch, the idol of the children of Ammon.8And he did in this manner for all his wives that were strangers, who burnt incense, and offered sacrifice to their gods.9And the Lord was angry with Solomon, because his mind was turned away from the Lord, the God of Israel, who had appeared to him twice;10And had commanded him concerning this thing, that he should not follow strange gods: but he kept not the things which the Lord commanded him.11The Lord therefore said to Solomon: Because thou hast done this, and hast not kept my covenant, and my precepts, which I have commanded thee, I will divide and rend thy kingdom, and will give it to thy servant.12Nevertheless, in thy days I will not do it, for David thy father's sake: but I will rend it out of the hand of thy son.13Neither will I take away the whole kingdom; but I will give one tribe to thy son, for the sake of David, my servant, and Jerusalem, which I have chosen.
4And when now he was old, his heart was perverted by the women, so that he followed strange gods. And his heart was not perfect with the Lord his God, as was the heart of his father David.5For Solomon worshipped Ashtoreth, the goddess of the Sidonians, and Milcom, the idol of the Ammonites.6And Solomon did what was not pleasing in the sight of the Lord. And he did not continue to follow the Lord, as his father David did.7Then Solomon built a shrine for Chemosh, the idol of Moab, on the mount that is opposite Jerusalem, and for Milcom, the idol of the sons of Ammon.8And he acted in this manner for all his foreign wives, who were burning incense and immolating to their gods.9And so, the Lord became angry with Solomon, because his mind had been turned away from the Lord, the God of Israel, who had appeared to him twice,10and who had instructed him about this matter, lest he follow strange gods. But he did not observe what the Lord commanded to him.11And so, the Lord said to Solomon: “Because you have this with you, and because you have not kept my covenant and my precepts, which I commanded to you, I will tear apart your kingdom, and I will give it to your servant.12Yet truly, I will not do it in your days, for the sake of your father David. From the hand of your son, I will tear it away.13Neither will I take away the whole kingdom. Instead, I will grant one tribe to your son, for the sake of David, my servant, and Jerusalem, which I have chosen.”
4For it came to pass, when Solomon was old, that his wives turned away his heart after other gods: and his heart was not perfect with the Lord his God, as was the heart of David his father.5For Solomon went after Ashtoreth the goddess of the Zidonians, and after Milcom the abomination of the Ammonites.6And Solomon did evil in the sight of the Lord, and went not fully after the Lord, as did David his father.7Then did Solomon build an high place for Chemosh, the abomination of Moab, in the hill that is before Jerusalem, and for Molech, the abomination of the children of Ammon.8And likewise did he for all his strange wives, which burnt incense and sacrificed unto their gods.9And the Lord was angry with Solomon, because his heart was turned from the Lord God of Israel, which had appeared unto him twice,10And had commanded him concerning this thing, that he should not go after other gods: but he kept not that which the Lord commanded.11Wherefore the Lord said unto Solomon, Forasmuch as this is done of thee, and thou hast not kept my covenant and my statutes, which I have commanded thee, I will surely rend the kingdom from thee, and will give it to thy servant.12Notwithstanding in thy days I will not do it for David thy father’s sake: but I will rend it out of the hand of thy son.13Howbeit I will not rend away all the kingdom; but will give one tribe to thy son for David my servant’s sake, and for Jerusalem’s sake which I have chosen.
The names in this passage are stranger than the translation lets on. Haydock notes that the Hebrew behind Astarthe is plural, as though the single goddess of the Sidonians were already a crowd of idols, and that the moon, the queen of heaven, is particularly meant — though Sanctius argued for Venus and Tirinus for Juno. Moloch he renders from the Hebrew as "their king," which the text flatly calls the abomination — the sun, Sanctius thought, or Saturn in Tirinus's reckoning. As for Chamos, Tirinus identifies him with Bacchus or Priapus, whom the Greeks called Komos because he presided over feasting, and adds the detail that fixes the tone: his worship was so shameful it was carried out at night. Calmet places the high place on the hill east of the city — of olives, Haydock supposes — which acquired for this reason the name the mount of offence; Abulensis and Salien reckon there were six such temples, one per nation among the wives.
The commentators refuse every available excuse. The obvious defence is that Solomon's idolatry was mere diplomacy, external conformity to keep peace in a foreign household; Calmet answers that those who excuse him this way in fact aggravate the crime, since a man who knows there is one God and bows anyway has sinned with his eyes open. Salien holds the worship was internal as well as external, Tirinus that he acted against his own better knowledge. The Fathers, Calmet notes, do not attempt to palliate any of it. Gregory says the wisdom that had been given him abandoned a heart which not even the discipline of the smallest tribulation had guarded; Augustine, that he began his reign with an ardent desire of wisdom, obtained it by spiritual love, and lost it by carnal affections; and, more devastatingly, that prosperity — always a severe trial for the wise — did him more harm than wisdom had done him good. Haydock, who dates the collapse to the end of a thirty-year reign begun in virtue, ranks him with Henry VIII, who also began well and ended in dishonour. Verse 9's own aggravation is that God had not left him to general principles: he appeared at Gabaon and again after the temple's consecration, and Abulensis adds the prophet sent during the building. Salien's summary is the bleakest sentence in the notes — no doubt priests and prophets often begged him to change, but the sinner is deaf until God speaks to his heart.
The detail worth carrying away is that Solomon was, in Salien's and Calmet's reckoning, about fifty when this happened, which is what scripture here means by old; Haydock counts the age as making it worse, not better. There is no version of this story in which the danger passes. The wisdom is genuine, the temple is built, the reign is a success, and the erosion comes afterwards and gradually, by way of affection rather than argument — which is why the modern form of it is so hard to notice, arriving as accommodation to people one loves rather than as apostasy. God's answer is a judgment held back: the kingdom will be torn, but not in his lifetime, and not entirely, for David thy father's sake (v. 12). Menochius sees why — David set this son on the throne, and the disgrace would rebound on him. What Solomon actually left behind stood on the hill facing the city. Tirinus notes that his shrines were not finally pulled down until the reign of Josias, generations of kings afterwards.
Responsorial Psalm · Psalm 106:3-4, 35-36, 37 and 40
3Blessed are they that keep judgment, and do justice at all times.4Remember us, O Lord, in the favour of thy people: visit us with thy salvation.35And they were mingled among the heathens, and learned their works:36And served their idols, and it became a stumblingblock to them.37And they sacrificed their sons, and their daughters to devils.40And the Lord was exceedingly angry with his people: and he abhorred his inheritance.
3Blessed are those who keep judgment and who do justice at all times.4Remember us, O Lord, with good will for your people. Visit us with your salvation,35And they were mixed among the Gentiles. And they learned their works,36and they served their graven images, and it became a scandal to them.37And they sacrificed their sons and their daughters to demons.40And the Lord became furiously angry with his people, and he abhorred his inheritance.
3Blessed are they that keep judgment, and he that doeth righteousness at all times.4Remember me, O Lord, with the favour that thou bearest unto thy people: O visit me with thy salvation;35But were mingled among the heathen, and learned their works.36And they served their idols: which were a snare unto them.37Yea, they sacrificed their sons and their daughters unto devils,40Therefore was the wrath of the Lord kindled against his people, insomuch that he abhorred his own inheritance.
Blessed are they that keep judgment, and do justice at all times (v. 3) looks like one idea said twice, and Augustine takes some trouble to show that it is not. Scripture loves to pair the two words, he admits — righteousness and judgment as the seat of God's throne, righteousness brought forth as the light and judgment as the noonday — and either may stand for the other. But taken in their proper senses they differ: a man keeps judgment by judging rightly and does justice by acting rightly, so the verse blesses those who keep judgment in faith and do righteousness in deed. Haydock adds the clause that makes the demand hard, at all times: only he who perseveres to the end shall be crowned. Verse 4 carries a textual variant worth knowing. Calmet notes that the Hebrew reads remember me, in the singular, while Aquila and the Syriac agree with the Septuagint's plural — and Augustine, who has the singular before him, prays to be counted among a people God is actually pleased with, since, as he dryly observes, God is not pleased with all of them.
The middle of the reading is a diagnosis, and Augustine states its mechanism in a single sentence: their not destroying them, but mingling with them, became to them an offence. What follows is the worst of it — they sacrificed their sons, and their daughters to devils (v. 37) — and here Augustine does something unexpected. He acknowledges that the historical books do not report Israel doing this. His response is neither to explain the verse away nor to assert it flatly: the psalm cannot lie, and the prophets repeat the charge in many rebukes, and besides, the literature of the pagans is not silent about the custom. He handles the next verse with the same care. The Latin says the land was slain with bloods, which looks exactly like a copyist writing interfecta where he meant infecta, defiled — and Augustine, having inspected Greek copies and found "slain" in them, refuses the correction, taking the harder reading as it stands: they were slaying their own souls when they offered up their sons and shed the blood of infants who could not consent. The last verse gets a similar restraint. Where the Douay has God exceedingly angry, Augustine reports that translators were reluctant to render the Greek thumos as anger at all, some preferring indignation or mind, and he insists that whichever word is used, no passion touches God; the term is borrowed from human custom to name the power of punishing.
The sequence is what should be read slowly, because it does not begin with atrocity. It begins with a decision not made — the nations left in place — and proceeds to mingling, then to learning their works, then to serving what one had merely tolerated, and only then to the altar with a child on it. Every stage looks reasonable from inside the previous one. The modern shape of it is the same drift: what is at first not worth a fight becomes the ordinary way of doing things, and then becomes the thing for which the young are spent. Against that the psalm sets a prayer rather than a resolution. Augustine reads visit us with thy salvation (v. 4) as a request for a person — visit us with your Christ — because the blessedness of v. 3 is not a standard one meets but a healing one receives, God making men righteous by curing them of their iniquities. It is asked by people who have just described their inheritance being abhorred, and who are asking to be remembered anyway.
Gospel · Mark 7:24-30
24And rising from thence he went into the coasts of Tyre and Sidon: and entering into a house, he would that no man should know it. And he could not be hid.25For a woman as soon as she heard of him, whose daughter had an unclean spirit, came in and fell down at his feet.26For the woman was a Gentile, a Syrophenician born. And she besought him that he would cast forth the devil out of her daughter.27Who said to her: suffer first the children to be filled: for it is not good to take the bread of the children and cast it to the dogs.28But she answered and said to him: Yea, Lord; for the whelps also eat under the table of the crumbs of the children.29And he said to her: For this saying, go thy way. The devil is gone out of thy daughter.30And when she was come into her house, she found the girl lying upon the bed and that the devil was gone out.
24And rising up, he went from there to the area of Tyre and Sidon. And entering into a house, he intended no one to know about it, but he was not able to remain hidden.25For a woman whose daughter had an unclean spirit, as soon as she heard about him, entered and fell prostrate at his feet.26For the woman was a Gentile, by birth a Syro-Phoenician. And she petitioned him, so that he would cast the demon from her daughter.27And he said to her: “First allow the sons to have their fill. For it is not good to take away the bread of the sons and throw it to the dogs.”28But she responded by saying to him: “Certainly, Lord. Yet the young dogs also eat, under the table, from the crumbs of the children.”29And he said to her, “Because of this saying, go; the demon has gone out of your daughter.”30And when she had gone to her house, she found the girl lying on the bed; and the demon had gone away.
24And from thence he arose, and went into the borders of Tyre and Sidon, and entered into an house, and would have no man know it: but he could not be hid.25For a certain woman, whose young daughter had an unclean spirit, heard of him, and came and fell at his feet:26The woman was a Greek, a Syrophenician by nation; and she besought him that he would cast forth the devil out of her daughter.27But Jesus said unto her, Let the children first be filled: for it is not meet to take the children’s bread, and to cast it unto the dogs.28And she answered and said unto him, Yes, Lord: yet the dogs under the table eat of the children’s crumbs.29And he said unto her, For this saying go thy way; the devil is gone out of thy daughter.30And when she was come to her house, she found the devil gone out, and her daughter laid upon the bed.
The Douay calls her a Gentile, a Syrophenician born (v. 26), which is already an interpretation. Lapide notes that the Greek word is έλλήνις, a Greek woman — not an ethnic description but an imperial one, since wherever the Greeks held sway all Gentiles were called Greeks, which is why Paul can write "the Jew first, and also the Greek" and mean the Jew and everyone else. Syrophenician, her second label, marks the part of Phoenicia facing Syria. But the sentence that has always troubled readers is earlier: Jesus enters a house and would that no man should know it. And he could not be hid (v. 24). Taken flatly, the verse reports a failed intention — which is precisely the objection the commentators raise against themselves: if he wished it and could not have it, his will was under control, and that is impossible.
The answer given under Augustine's name is that the will in question was narrower than it looks. He willed not to be published by his own disciples, and willed to be sought out by these Gentiles — and that is what happened, since it was not his followers but the people who saw him enter the house who spread the news. Bede draws the lesson: in an unfamiliar region the disciples were to shrink from the glory of human praise, without ever ceasing the work when the faith of the good deserved a miracle. Augustine also reconciles Matthew, who has the woman crying after them on the road, with Mark, who has her indoors: she came to him in the house, he answered not a word, and in that silence went out, so that she followed and won her request on the way. Theophylact takes the dogs for the Gentiles as the Jews reckoned them and the bread for the benefit promised to Israel, and says the delay is deliberate — to show her faith firm, and to teach us not to tire in prayer but to persist until we obtain. Pseudo-Chrysostom insists the refusal reflects no deficiency of power, only the jealousy that would follow if the benefit went equally to two peoples with no dealings with each other. Nobody treats her answer as a clever rebuttal. Her placing herself in the rank of dogs, Pseudo-Chrysostom says, is a mark of reverence: she counts it a favour to eat as a dog does, not from some other table but from the Master's own. Theophylact hears her conceding everything — the Jews have the whole loaf, I ask only the crumbs — then makes the decisive observation about the cure. Christ did not say my virtue hath made thee whole; he said for this saying, meaning for the faith the saying disclosed.
Bede takes the case as a precedent. The devil left the daughter on account of the mother's humble and faithful words, which is why infants are catechised and baptized: freed by the faith and confession of their parents, though they can as yet neither know anything nor do good or evil. Theophylact turns the same scene inward — the soul that falls into sin is the woman, her sick daughter is her evil actions, and sinners are the dogs, unfit for the bread of God until, knowing themselves to be dogs, they confess. That is the movement pride will not perform: not asserting a right to the table, but willing to be answered slowly, in public, with a word that stings, and asking anyway. Pseudo-Jerome reads the woman as the Church and her daughter as the western nations turned from dogs into sheep. What she asks for is not the unbroken loaf of the letter. It is the crumbs of spiritual understanding, taken from under the table where the children are still eating.
· sources ·
The complete public-domain commentary this reading's note draws from, unabridged. Every claim in the note traces to a passage here.
First Reading 1 Kings 11:4-13
Astarthe. Hebrew Hashtoreth, "ewes," is in the plural form, as if to denote many idols. But the moon, or the queen of heaven, (Jeremias vii. 18.) is particularly designated, Judges ii. 12. (Haydock) --- Some explain it of Venus, (Sanctius) or Juno. (Tirinus) --- Moloch. Hebrew Molciom, (their king) "the abomination;" (Haydock) supposed to be the sun, (Sanctius) or saturn. (Tirinus) See 4 Kings xxiii. 10.
Chamos. Bacchus or Priapus, called Greek: Komos, by the Greeks, as he presided over "feasting." His worship was most shameful, and therefore performed in the night. The temples erected by Solomon, were not entirely demolished till the reign of Josias. (Tirinus) --- Hill. Hebrew, "Then Solomon erected a high place (temple, altar, or grove) to Chamos, the abomination of Moad, on the, &c., hill;" it is supposed of olives, (Haydock) to the east of Jerusalem, which was hence called, the mount of offence, 4 Kings xxiii. 13. (Calmet) --- Yet no place was consecrated to idols within the city. (Menochius) --- The idols of Egypt are not specified, though the daughter of Pharao would, probably, interest herself in their favour. The Jews were more prone to those of Chanaan. We find, however, that they were addicted to the worship of Adonis, who was highly revered in Egypt; (Ezechiel viii. 14.; Calmet) and the golden calves were an imitation of Apis. (Haydock) --- Six temples were probably built, as wives of so many different nations are specified, ver. 1. (Abulensis) (Salien)
Twice, or repeatedly. See chap. ix. 2. (Haydock) --- He had appeared to him at Gabaon, and after the consecration of the temple, (Menochius) besides sending a prophet to him while he was building, chap. vi. 12. (Abulensis) --- God was not content with giving him the general commandments: he had condescended to caution him in a most particular and earnest manner: (Haydock) so that his transgression is more horrible and ungrateful. (Calmet) --- No doubt the priests and prophets had often besought him to alter his conduct; but the sinner is deaf, till God speak to his heart. (Salien, the year of the world 3054.)
This. Literally and Hebrew, "Because thou hast this with thee." (Haydock) --- Since this is thy conduct, and fixed determination, to abandon my service, I will also reject thee. The Lord spoke to him in a third vision, (Calmet) or by the mouth of Ahias, (Abulensis) who was likewise appointed to inform Jeroboam of his election to a part of the kingdom. (Salien, the year of the world 3059.)
Sake. As David placed this son upon the throne, the disgrace would seem to revert on him. (Menochius) --- Here we behold the reward of piety, and how desirable a thing it is to have saints for our parents. (Haydock)
One tribe. Besides that of Juda, his own native tribe. (Challoner) --- That of Benjamin had been so reduced, that it scarcely deserved the name of a tribe. It was also invariably connected with the adjoining tribe of Juda; as many of the other tribes, after the captivities of Assyria and Babylon, went by the common title of Jews. (Tirinus) --- The Levites, and many of the Israelites, came to inhabit in the land of Juda, for the sake of the true religion, chap. xii. 17., and 2 Paralipomenon xi. 13, 16. Jeroboam banished the tribe of Levi from his dominions, that he might more easily introduce a change of religion among his subjects. The two kingdoms were thus almost equal in strength. (Calmet) --- Chosen for the abode of holiness, and the seat of government. (Salien) --- One tribe....and Jerusalem; which latter may denote the tribe of Benjamin. (Worthington)
1 But king Solomon loved many strange women, together with the daughter of Pharaoh, women of the Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Zidonians, and Hittites; 2 Of the nations concerning which the Lord said unto the children of Israel, Ye shall not go in to them, neither shall they come in unto you: for surely they will turn away your heart after their gods: Solomon clave unto these in love. 3 And he had seven hundred wives, princesses, and three hundred concubines: and his wives turned away his heart. 4 For it came to pass, when Solomon was old, that his wives turned away his heart after other gods: and his heart was not perfect with the Lord his God, as was the heart of David his father. 5 For Solomon went after Ashtoreth the goddess of the Zidonians, and after Milcom the abomination of the Ammonites. 6 And Solomon did evil in the sight of the Lord , and went not fully after the Lord , as did David his father. 7 Then did Solomon build a high place for Chemosh, the abomination of Moab, in the hill that is before Jerusalem, and for Molech, the abomination of the children of Ammon. 8 And likewise did he for all his strange wives, which burnt incense and sacrificed unto their gods.
This is a sad story, and very surprising, of Solomon's defection and degeneracy.
I. Let us enquire into the occasions and particulars of it. Shall Solomon fall, that was the beauty of Israel, and so great a blessing of his generation? Yes, it is too true, and the scripture is faithful in relating it, and repeating it, and referring to it long after, Neh. xiii. 26 . There was no king like Solomon who was beloved of his God, yet even him did outlandish women cause to sin. There is the summary of his apostasy; it was the woman that deceived him, and was first in the transgression.
1. He doted on strange women, many strange women. Here his revolt began. (1.) He gave himself to women, which his mother had particularly cautioned him against. Prov. xxxi. 3 , Give not thy strength unto women (perhaps alluding to Samson, who lost his strength by giving information of it to a woman), for it is that which, as much as any thing, destroys kings. His father David's fall began with the lusts of the flesh, which he should have taken warning by. The love of women has cast down many wounded ( Prov. vii. 26 ) and many (says bishop Hall) have had their head broken by their own rib. (2.) He took many women, so many that, at last, they amounted to 700 wives and 300 concubines, 1000 in all, and not one good one among them, as he himself owns in his penitential sermon ( Eccl. vii. 28 ), for no woman of established virtue would be one of such a set. God had, by his law, particularly forbidden the kings to multiply either horses or wives, Deut. xvii. 16, 17 . How he broke the former law, in multiplying horses, and having them out of Egypt too (which was expressly prohibited in that law) we read ch. x. 29 , and here we are told how he broke the latter (which proved of more fatal consequence) in multiplying wives. Note, Less sins, made gold with, open the door to greater. David had multiplied wives too much, and perhaps that made Solomon presume it lawful. Note, If those that are in reputation for religion in any thing set a bad example, they know not what a deal of mischief they may do by it, particularly to their own children. One bad act of a good man may be of more pernicious consequence to others than twenty of a wicked man. Probably Solomon, when he began to multiply wives, intended not to exceed his father's number. But the way of sin is down-hill; those that have got into it cannot easily stop themselves. Divine wisdom has appointed one woman for one man, did so at first; and those who do not think one enough will not think two or three enough. Unbridled lust will be unbounded, and the loosened hind will wander endlessly. But this was not all: (3.) They were strange women, Moabites, Ammonites, &c., of the nations which God had particularly forbidden them to intermarry with, v. 2 . Some think it was in policy that he married these foreigners, by them to get intelligence of the state of those countries. I rather fear it was because the daughters of Israel were too grave and modest for him, and those foreigners pleased him with the looseness and wantonness of their dress, and air, and conversation. Or, perhaps, it was looked upon as a piece of state to have his seraglio, as his other treasures, replenished with that which was far-fetched; as if that were too great an honour for the best of his subjects which would really have been a disgrace to the meanest of them—to be his mistresses. And, (4.) To complete the mischief, Solomon clave unto these in love, v. 2 . He not only kept them, but was extravagantly fond of them, set his heart upon them, spent his time among them, thought every thing well they said and did, and despised Pharaoh's daughter, his rightful wife, who had been dear to him, and all the ladies of Israel, in comparison of them. Solomon was master of a great deal of knowledge, but to what purpose, when he had no better a government of his appetites?
2. He was drawn by them to the worship of strange gods, as Israel to Baal-peor by the daughters of Moab. This was the bad consequence of his multiplying wives. We have reason to think it impaired his health, and hastened upon him the decays of age; it exhausted his treasure, which, though vast indeed, would be found little enough to maintain the pride and vanity of all these women; perhaps it occasioned him, in his latter end, to neglect his business, by which he lost his supplies from abroad, and was forced, for the keeping up of his grandeur, to burden his subjects with those taxes which they complained of, ch. xii. 4 . But none of these consequences were so bad as this: His wives turned away his heart after other gods, v. 3, 4 . (1.) He grew cool and indifferent in his own religion and remiss in the service of the God of Israel: His heart was not perfect with the Lord his God ( v. 4 ), nor did he follow him fully ( v. 6 ), like David. We cannot suppose that he quite cast off the worship of God, much less that he restrained or hindered it (the temple-service went on as usual); but he grew less frequent, and less serious, in his ascent to the house of the Lord and his attendance on his altar. He left his first love, lost his zeal for God, and did not persevere to the end as he had begun; therefore it is said he was not perfect, because he was not constant; and he followed not God fully, because he turned from following him, and did not continue to the end. His father David had many faults, but he never neglected the worship of God, nor grew remiss in that, as Solomon did (his wives using all their arts to divert him from it), and there began his apostasy. (2.) He tolerated and maintained his wives in their idolatry and made no scruple of joining with them in it. Pharaoh's daughter was proselyted (as is supposed) to the Jews' religion, but, when he began to grow careless in the worship of God himself, he used no means to convert his other wives to it; in complaisance to them, he built chapels for their gods ( v. 7, 8 ), maintained their priests, and occasionally did himself attend their altars, making a jest of it, asking, "What harm is there in it? Are not all religions alike?" which (says bishop Patrick) has been the disease of some great wits. When he humoured one thus, the rest would take it ill if he did not, in like manner, gratify them, so that he did it for all his wives ( v. 8 ), and at last came to such a degree of impiety that he set up a high place for Chemosh in the hill that is before Jerusalem, the mount of Olives, as if to confront the temple which he himself had built. These high places continued here, not utterly demolished, till Josiah's time, 2 Kings xxiii. 13 . This is the account here given of Solomon's apostasy.
II. Let us now pause awhile, and lament Solomon's fall; and we may justly stand and wonder at it. How has the gold become dim! How has the most fine gold changed! Be astonished, O heavens! at this, and be horribly afraid, as the prophet exclaims in a like case, Jer. ii. 12 .
1. How strange, (1.) That Solomon, in his old age, should be ensnared with fleshly lusts, youthful lusts. As we must never presume upon the strength of our resolutions, so neither upon the weakness of our corruptions, so as to be secure and off our guard. (2.) That so wise a man as Solomon was, so famed for a quick understanding and sound judgment, should suffer himself to be made such a fool of by these foolish women. (3.) That one who had so often and so plainly warned others of the danger of the love of women should himself be so wretchedly bewitched with it; it is easier to see a mischief, and to show it to others, than to shun it ourselves. (4.) That so good a man, so zealous for the worship of God, who had been so conversant with divine things, and who prayed that excellent prayer at the dedication of the temple, should do these sinful things. Is this Solomon? Have all his wisdom and devotion come to this at last? Never was gallant ship so wrecked; never was crown so profaned.
9 And the Lord was angry with Solomon, because his heart was turned from the Lord God of Israel, which had appeared unto him twice, 10 And had commanded him concerning this thing, that he should not go after other gods: but he kept not that which the Lord commanded. 11 Wherefore the Lord said unto Solomon, Forasmuch as this is done of thee, and thou hast not kept my covenant and my statutes, which I have commanded thee, I will surely rend the kingdom from thee, and will give it to thy servant. 12 Notwithstanding in thy days I will not do it for David thy father's sake: but I will rend it out of the hand of thy son. 13 Howbeit I will not rend away all the kingdom; but will give one tribe to thy son for David my servant's sake, and for Jerusalem's sake which I have chosen.
Here is, I. God's anger against Solomon for his sin. The thing he did displeased the Lord. Time was then the Lord loved Solomon ( 2 Sam. xii. 24 ) and delighted in him ( ch. x. 9 ), but now the Lord was angry with Solomon ( v. 9 ), for there was in his sin, 1. The most base ingratitude that could be. He turned from the Lord who had appeared unto him twice, once before he began to build the temple ( ch. iii. 5 ) and once after he had dedicated it, ch. ix. 2 . God keeps account of the gracious visits he makes us, whether we do or no, knows how often he has appeared to us and for us, and will remember it against us if we turn from him. God's appearing to Solomon was such a sensible confirmation of his faith as should have for ever prevented his worshipping any other god; it was also such a distinguishing favour, and put such an honour upon him, as he ought never to have forgotten, especially considering what God said to him in both these appearances. 2. The most wilful disobedience. This was the very thing concerning which God had commanded him—that he should not go after other gods, yet he was not restrained by such an express admonition, v. 10 . Those who have dominion over men are apt to forget God's dominion over them; and, while they demand obedience from their inferiors, to deny it to him who is the Supreme.
II. The message he sent him hereupon ( v. 11 ): The Lord said unto Solomon (it is likely by a prophet) that he must expect to smart for his apostasy. And here, 1. The sentence is just, that, since he had revolted from God, part of his kingdom should revolt from his family; he had given God's glory to the creature, and therefore God would give his crown to his servant: " I will rend the kingdom from thee, in thy posterity, and will give it to thy servant, who shall bear rule over much of that for which thou hast laboured." This was a great mortification to Solomon, who pleased himself no doubt with the prospect of the entail of his rich kingdom upon his heirs for ever. Sin brings ruin upon families, cuts off entails, alienates estates, and lays men's honour in the dust. 2. Yet the mitigations of it are very kind, for David's sake ( v. 12, 13 ), that is, for the sake of the promise made to David. Thus all the favour God shows to man is for Christ's sake, and for the sake of the covenant made with him. The kingdom shall be rent from Solomon's house, but, (1.) Not immediately. Solomon shall not live to see it done, but it shall be rent out of the hand of his son, a son that was born to him by one of his strange wives, for his mother was an Ammonitess ( 1 Kings xiv. 31 ) and probably had been a promoter of idolatry. What comfort can a man take in leaving children and an estate behind him if he do not leave a blessing behind him? Yet, if judgments be coming, it is a favour to us if they come not in our days, as 2 Kings xx. 19 . (2.) Not wholly. One tribe, that of Judah, the strongest and most numerous, shall remain to the house of David ( v. 13 ), for Jerusalem's sake, which David built, and for the sake of the temple there, which Solomon built; these shall not go into other hands. Solomon did not quickly nor wholly turn away from God; therefore God did not quickly nor wholly take the kingdom from him.
4. when Solomon was old-- He could not have been more than fifty.
his wives turned away his heart after other gods-- Some, considering the lapse of Solomon into idolatry as a thing incredible, regard him as merely humoring his wives in the practice of their superstition; and, in countenancing their respective rites by his presence, as giving only an outward homage--a sensible worship, in which neither his understanding nor his heart was engaged. The apology only makes matters worse, as it implies an adding of hypocrisy and contempt of God to an open breach of His law. There seems no possibility of explaining the language of the sacred historian, but as intimating that Solomon became an actual and open idolater, worshipping images of wood or stone in sight of the very temple which, in early life, he had erected to the true God. Hence that part of Olivet was called the high place of Tophet ( Jr 7:30-34 ), and the hill is still known as the Mount of Offense, of the Mount of Corruption ( 2Ki 23:13 ).
5-7. Ashtoreth-- Astarte,
Milcom-- Molech,
and Chemosh-- He built altars for these three; but, although he is described ( 1Ki 11:8 ) as doing the same for "all his strange wives," there is no evidence that they had idols distinct from these; and there is no trace whatever of Egyptian idolatry.
8. burnt incense and sacrificed unto their gods-- The first was considered a higher act of homage, and is often used as synonymous with worship ( 2Ki 22:17 ; 23:5 ).
1Ki 11:9-13 . God Threatens Him.
9-12. the Lord was angry with Solomon-- The divine appearance, first at Gibeon [1Ki 3:5], and then at Jerusalem [1Ki 9:2], after the dedication of the temple, with the warnings given him on both occasions [1Ki 3:11-14; 9:3-9], had left Solomon inexcusable; and it was proper and necessary that on one who had been so signally favored with the gifts of Heaven, but who had grossly abused them, a terrible judgment should fall. The divine sentence was announced to him probably by Ahijah; but there was mercy mingled with judgment, in the circumstance, that it should not be inflicted on Solomon personally--and that a remnant of the kingdom should be spared--"for David's sake, and for Jerusalem's sake, which had been chosen" to put God's name there; not from a partial bias in favor of either, but that the divine promise might stand ( 2Sa 7:12-16 ).
13. I will give one tribe to thy son-- There were left to Rehoboam the tribes of Judah, Benjamin, and Levi ( 2Ch 11:12 , 13 ); and multitudes of Israelites, who, after the schism of the kingdom, established their residence within the territory of Judah to enjoy the privileges of the true religion ( 1Ki 12:17 ). These are all reckoned as one tribe.
1Ki 11:14-40 . Solomon's Adversaries.
Responsorial Psalm Psalm 106:3-4, 35-36, 37 and 40
(ver. 3); he perhaps meant those praises of His, which are understood as His works in His commandments? "For it is God," saith the Apostle, "who worketh in you," ...since He worketh in these things in a manner that cannot be spoken. "Who will do all His praises heard?" that is, who, when he hath heard them, doth all His praises? which are the works of His commandments. As far as they are done, although all which are heard are not performed, He is to be praised, who "worketh in us both to will and to do of His good pleasure." For this reason, while he might have said, all His commandments, or, all the works of His commandments; he preferred saying, "His praises."...
4. But unless there were some difference between judgment and righteousness, we should not read in another Psalm, "Until righteousness turn again unto judgment." The Scripture, indeed, loveth to place these two words together; as, "Righteousness and judgment are the habitation of His seat;" and this, "He shall make thy righteousness as clear as the light, and thy judgment as the noon-day;" where there is apparently a repetition of the same sentiment. And perhaps on account of the resemblance of signification one may be put for the other, either judgment for righteousness, or righteousness for judgment: yet, if they be spoken of in their proper sense, I doubt not that there is some difference; viz. that he is said to keep judgment who judgeth rightly, but he to do righteousness who acts righteously. And I think that the verse, "Until righteousness turn again unto judgment," may not absurdly be understood in this sense: that here also those are called blessed, who keep judgment in faith, and do righteousness in deed....
5. Next, since God justifieth, that is, maketh men righteous, by healing them from their iniquities, a prayer followeth: "Remember me, O Lord, according to the favour that Thou bearest unto Thy people" (ver. 4): that is, that we may be among those with whom Thou art well pleased; since God is not well pleased with them all. "O visit me with Thy salvation." This is the Saviour Himself, in whom sins are forgiven, and souls healed, that they may be able to keep judgment, and do righteousness; and since they who here speak know such men to be blessed, they pray for this themselves...."Visit us," then, "with Thy salvation," that is, with Thy Christ. "To see the felicity of Thy chosen, and to rejoice in the gladness of Thy people"
(ver. 35). "Insomuch that they worshipped their idols, which became to them an offence"
(ver. 36). Their not destroying them, but mingling with them, became to them an offence.
28. "Yea, they offered their sons and their daughters unto devils"
(ver. 37); "and shed innocent blood, even the blood of their sons and of their daughters, whom they offered unto the idols of Canaan" (ver. 38). That history doth not relate that they offered their sons and daughters to devils and idols; but neither can that Psalm lie, nor the Prophets, who assert this in many passages of their rebukes. But the literature of the Gentiles is not silent respecting this custom of theirs. But what is it that followeth? "And the land was slain with bloods." We might suppose that this was a mistake of the writer, and that he had written interfecta for infecta, were it not for the goodness of God, who hath willed His Scriptures to be written in many languages; were it not that we see it written as in the text in many Greek copies which we have inspected; "the land was slain with bloods." What meaneth then, "the land was slain," unless this be referred to the men who dwelt in the land, by a metaphorical expression....For they themselves were slaying their own souls when they offered up their sons, and when they shed the blood of infants who were far from consent to this crime: whence it is said, "They shed innocent blood." "The land" therefore "was slain with bloods, and defiled by their works"
(ver. 40). Our translators have been unwilling to use the word anger, for the Greek thumos; though some have used it; while others translate by "indignation" or "mind." Whichever of these terms be adopted, passion doth not affect God; but the power of punishing hath assumed this name metaphorically from custom.
30. "Insomuch that He abhorred His own inheritance; and He gave them over into the hand of the heathen: and they that hated them were lords over them"
Times. He only who perseveres to the end shall be crowned, Matthew xxiv. 13., and Ezechiel xxxiii. (Haydock) --- Such as these can alone worthily sound forth God's praises, (Berthier) being so happy as to preserve their innocence, or at least to repent. (Worthington)
Us. Hebrew, "me." But Aquila, Syriac, &c., agree with the Septuagint. Some of the Jews were already returned, and pray for the liberation of their brethren. (Calmet) --- The Fathers explain it of Christian converts. (St. Chrysostom) --- People. According to thy gracious promises, that we may enjoy the blessings of thy elect. (Worthington)
1 Praise ye the Lord . O give thanks unto the Lord ; for he is good: for his mercy endureth for ever. 2 Who can utter the mighty acts of the Lord ? who can show forth all his praise? 3 Blessed are they that keep judgment, and he that doeth righteousness at all times. 4 Remember me, O Lord , with the favour that thou bearest unto thy people: O visit me with thy salvation; 5 That I may see the good of thy chosen, that I may rejoice in the gladness of thy nation, that I may glory with thine inheritance.
We are here taught,
I. To bless God ( v. 1, 2 ): Praise you the Lord, that is, 1. Give him thanks for his goodness, the manifestation of it to us, and the many instances of it. He is good and his mercy endures for ever; let us therefore own our obligations to him and make him a return of our best affections and services. 2. Give him the glory of his greatness, his mighty acts, proofs of his almighty power, wherein he has done great things, and such as would be opposed. Who can utter these? Who is worthy to do it? Who is able to do it? They are so many that they cannot be numbered, so mysterious that they cannot be described; when we have said the most we can of the mighty acts of the Lord, the one half is not told; still there is more to be said; it is a subject that cannot be exhausted. We must show forth his praise; we may show forth some of it, but who can show forth all? Not the angels themselves. This will not excuse us in not doing what we can, but should quicken us to do all we can.
II. To bless the people of God, to call and account them happy ( v. 3 ): Those that keep judgment are blessed, for they are fit to be employed in praising God. God's people are those whose principles are sound— They keep judgment (they adhere to the rules of wisdom and religion, and their practices are agreeable); they do righteousness, are just to God and to all men, and herein they are steady and constant; they do it at all times, in all manner of conversation, at every turn, in every instance, and herein persevering to the end.
34 They did not destroy the nations, concerning whom the Lord commanded them: 35 But were mingled among the heathen, and learned their works. 36 And they served their idols: which were a snare unto them. 37 Yea, they sacrificed their sons and their daughters unto devils, 38 And shed innocent blood, even the blood of their sons and of their daughters, whom they sacrificed unto the idols of Canaan: and the land was polluted with blood. 39 Thus were they defiled with their own works, and went a whoring with their own inventions. 40 Therefore was the wrath of the Lord kindled against his people, insomuch that he abhorred his own inheritance. 41 And he gave them into the hand of the heathen; and they that hated them ruled over them. 42 Their enemies also oppressed them, and they were brought into subjection under their hand. 43 Many times did he deliver them; but they provoked him with their counsel, and were brought low for their iniquity. 44 Nevertheless he regarded their affliction, when he heard their cry: 45 And he remembered for them his covenant, and repented according to the multitude of his mercies. 46 He made them also to be pitied of all those that carried them captives. 47 Save us, O Lord our God, and gather us from among the heathen, to give thanks unto thy holy name, and to triumph in thy praise. 48 Blessed be the Lord God of Israel from everlasting to everlasting: and let all the people say, Amen. Praise ye the Lord .
Here, I. The narrative concludes with an account of Israel's conduct in Canaan, which was of a piece with that in the wilderness, and God's dealings with them, wherein, as all along, both justice and mercy appeared.
1. They were very provoking to God. The miracles and mercies which settled them in Canaan made no more deep and durable impressions upon them than those which fetched them out of Egypt; for by the time they were just settled in Canaan they corrupted themselves, and forsook God. Observe,
(1.) The steps of their apostasy. [1.] They spared the nations which God had doomed to destruction ( v. 34 ); when they had got the good land God had promised them they had no zeal against the wicked inhabitants whom the Lord commanded them to extirpate, pretending pity; but so merciful is God that no man needs to be in any case more compassionate than he. [2.] When they spared them they promised themselves that, notwithstanding this, they would not join in any dangerous affinity with them. But the way of sin is down-hill; omissions make way for commissions; when they neglect to destroy the heathen the next news we hear is, They were mingled among the heathen, made leagues with them and contracted an intimacy with them, so that they learned their works, v. 35 . That which is rotten will sooner corrupt that which is sound than be cured or made sound by it. [3.] When they mingled with them, and learned some of their works that seemed innocent diversions and entertainments, yet they thought they would never join with them in their worship; but by degrees they learned that too ( v. 36 ): They served their idols in the same manner, and with the same rites, that they served them; and they became a snare to them. That sin drew on many more, and brought the judgments of God upon them, which they themselves could not but be sensible of and yet knew not how to recover themselves. [4.] When they joined with them in some of their idolatrous services, which they thought had least harm in them, they little thought that ever they should be guilty of that barbarous and inhuman piece of idolatry the sacrificing of their living children to their dead gods; but they came to that at last ( v. 37, 38 ), in which Satan triumphed over his worshippers, and regaled himself in blood and slaughter: They sacrificed their sons and daughters, pieces of themselves, to devils, and added murder, the most unnatural murder, to their idolatry; one cannot think of it without horror. They shed innocent blood, the most innocent, for it was infant-blood, nay, it was the blood of their sons and their daughters. See the power of the spirit that works in the children of disobedience, and see his malice. The beginning of idolatry and superstition, like that of strife, is as the letting forth of water, and there is no villany which those that venture upon it can be sure they shall stop short of, for God justly gives them up to a reprobate mind, Rom. i. 28 .
(2.) Their sin was, in part, their own punishment; for by it, [1.] They wronged their country: The land was polluted with blood, v. 38 . That pleasant land, that holy land, was rendered uncomfortable to themselves, and unfit to receive those kind tokens of God's favour and presence in it which were designed to be its honour. [2.] They wronged their consciences ( v. 39 ): They went a whoring with their own inventions, and so debauched their own minds, and were defiled with their own works, and rendered odious in the eyes of the holy God, and perhaps of their own consciences.
2. God brought his judgments upon them; and what else could be expected? For his name is Jealous, and he is a jealous God. (1.) He fell out with them for it, v. 40 . He was angry with them: The wrath of God, that consuming fire, was kindled against his people; for from them he took it as more insulting and ungrateful than from the heathen that never knew him. Nay, he was sick of them: He abhorred his own inheritance, which once he had taken pleasure in; yet the change was not in him, but in them. This is the worst thing in sin, that it makes us loathsome to God; and the nearer any are to God in profession the more loathsome are they if they rebel against him, like a dunghill at our door. (2.) Their enemies then fell upon them, and, their defence having departed, made an easy prey of them ( v. 41, 42 ): He gave them into the hands of the heathen. Observe here how the punishment answered to the sin: They mingled with the heathen and learned their works; from them they willingly took the infection of sin, and therefore God justly made use of them as the instruments of their correction. Sinners often see themselves ruined by those by whom they have suffered themselves to be debauched. Satan, who is a tempter, will be a tormentor. The heathen hated them. Apostates lose all the love on God's side, and get none on Satan's; and when those that hated them ruled over them, and they were brought into subjection under them, no marvel that they oppressed them and ruled them with rigour; and thus God made them know the difference between his service and the service of the kings of the countries, 2 Chron. xii. 8 . (3.) When God granted them some relief, yet they went on in their sins, and their troubles also were continued, v. 43 . This refers to the days of the Judges, when God often raised up deliverers and wrought deliverances for them, and yet they relapsed to idolatry and provoked God with their counsel, their idolatrous inventions, to deliver them up to some other oppressor, so that at last they were brought very low for their iniquity. Those that by sin disparage themselves, and will not by repentance humble themselves, are justly debased, and humbled, and brought low, by the judgments of God. (4.) At length they cried unto God, and God returned in favour to them, v. 44-46 . They were chastened for their sins, but not destroyed, cast down, but not cast off. God appeared for them, [1.] As a God of mercy, who looked upon their grievances, regarded their affliction, beheld when distress was upon them (so some), who looked over their complaints, for he heard their cry with tender compassion ( Exod. iii. 7 ) and overlooked their provocations; for though he had said, and had reason to say it, that he would destroy them, yet he repented, according to the multitude of his mercies, and reversed the sentence. Though he is not a man that he should repent, so as to change his mind, yet he is a gracious God, who pities us, and changes his way. [2.] As a God of truth, who remembered for them his covenant, and made good every word that he had spoken; and therefore, bad as they were, he would not break with them, because he would not break his own promise. [3.] As a God of power, who has all hearts in his hand, and turns them which way soever he pleases. He made them to be pitied even of those that carried them captives, and hated them, and ruled them with rigour. He not only restrained the remainder of their enemies' wrath, that it should not utterly consume them, but he infused compassion even into their stony hearts, and made them relent, which was more than any art of man could have done with the utmost force of rhetoric. Note, God can change lions into lambs, and, when a man's ways please the Lord, will make even his enemies to pity him and be at peace with him. When God pities men shall. Tranquillus Deus tranquillat omnia—A God at peace with us makes every thing at peace.
II. The psalm concludes with prayer and praise. 1. Prayer for the completing of his people's deliverance. Even when the Lord brought back the captivity of his people still there was occasion to pray, Lord, turn again our captivity ( Ps. cxxvi. 1 , 4 ); so here ( v. 47 ), Save us, O Lord our God! and gather us from among the heathen. We may suppose that many who were forced into foreign countries, in the times of the Judges (as Naomi was, Ruth i. 1 ), had not returned in the beginning of David's reign, Saul's time being discouraging, and therefore it was seasonable to pray, Lord, gather the dispersed Israelites from among the heathen, to give thanks to thy holy name, not only that they may have cause to give thanks and hearts to give thanks, that they may have opportunity to do it in the courts of the Lord's house, from which they were now banished, and so may triumph in thy praise, over those that had in scorn challenged them to sing the Lord's song in a strange land. 2. Praise for the beginning and progress of it ( v. 48 ): Blessed be the Lord God of Israel from everlasting to everlasting. He is a blessed God from eternity, and will be so to eternity, and so let him be praised by all his worshippers. Let the priests say this, and then let all the people say, Amen, Hallelujah, in token of their cheerful concurrence in all these prayers, praises, and confessions. According to this rubric, or directory, we find that when this psalm (or at least the closing verses of it) was sung all the people said Amen, and praised the Lord by saying, Hallelujah. By these two comprehensive words it is very proper, in religious assemblies, to testify their joining with their ministers in the prayers and praises which, as their mouth, they offer up to God, according to his will, saying Amen to the prayers and Hallelujah to the praises.
3. The blessing is limited to those whose principles and acts are right. How "blessed" Israel would be now, if he had "observed God's statutes" ( Psa 105:45 ).
4-5. In view of the desert of sins to be confessed, the writer invokes God's covenant mercy to himself and the Church, in whose welfare he rejoices. The speaker, me, I, is not the Psalmist himself, but the people, the present generation (compare Psa 106:6 ).
visit-- (Compare Psa 8:4 ).
34-39. They not only failed to expel the heathen, as God
commanded-- ( Ex 23:32 , 33 ), literally, "said (they should)," but conformed to their idolatries [Psa 106:36], and thus became spiritual adulterers ( Psa 73:27 ).
40-43. Those nations first seduced and then oppressed them (compare Jud 1:34 ; 2:14; 3:30). Their apostasies ungratefully repaid God's many mercies till He finally abandoned them to punishment ( Le 26:39 ).
Gospel Mark 7:24-30
CHAPTER 7
1 The Pharisees find fault at the disciples for eating with unwashen hands. 8 They break the commandment of God by the traditions of men. 14 Meat defileth not the man. 24 He healeth the Syrophenician woman's daughter of an unclean spirit, 31 and one that was deaf, and stammered in his speech.
Ver. 2. To eat with common, that is, with unwashen hands. Hands unwashed were called common, because unclean and profane things were common to both Jews and Gentiles, to clean and unclean persons alike.
Observe, the Apostles were not so boorish as not to wash their hands before dining or supping, which even husbandmen and artisans do before meals; but they abstained from the ceremonial, or rather the superstitious washing of the Pharisees, which they scrupulously observed from the tradition of their ancestors.
Ver. 3. Often washing: Syr. betilarth, i.e., diligently or carefully; Gr. πυγμη̃, zealously; Heb. caph el cabh, i.e., hand to hand, namely, by constant rubbing, as they do who wish to cleanse defiled hands.
Ver. 4. From the market. Because in the market are all kinds, both of persons and things, clean and unclean, by coming in contact with which they feared they had incurred pollution, and so they thought they could not cleanse themselves from such contamination except by washing, not their hands only, but their whole body. Whence it follows:
Unless they be baptized, i.e., unless they immerse and wash their whole body, as the Jews do frequently, even at the present time. For to be baptized is more than to wash the hands. Because, therefore, by conversing with and touching Gentiles in the market they were compelled to handle some things that were unclean, they washed themselves all over when they came home.
Of pots: Gr. ξεστω̃ν, i.e., of wine-drinking vessels. The Syriac has ænophororun, vessels in which wine is carried. Vatablus understands wooden vessels, which were turned and polished, or ornamented with carving.
And beds: on which they reclined at table.
Ver. 15. Make a man common (Vulg.), i.e., defile him, as some MSS. read.
Ver. 19. Because it entereth not into his heart, i.e., into his soul, and cannot therefore defile it. But goeth into the belly, where the purer portion of the food, being separated, proceeds to the liver and heart; but that which is impure and feculent into the draught, by its going forth, purging, i.e., leaving pure all meats. For in that it, the impure, goeth away, it cleanses and purifies the remainder of the food.
Ver. 26. A Gentile: Gr. έλλήνις, i.e., a Grecian woman, for where the Greeks bore sway, all Gentiles were called Greeks. Hence the expression in the first chapter of the Epistle to the Romans, "The Jew first, and also the Greek" i.e., the Gentile.
A Syrophonician, i.e., belonging to that part of Phœnicia which looks towards Syria.
Ver. 32. And dumb: Gr. μογιλάλον, i.e., speaking with difficulty or an impediment, stammering. For when he was healed by Christ he spake right, i.e., freely, as it is in the 35th verse. He was not, therefore, entirely dumb, as they are who are born deaf. These are called in Greek άλαλοι.
Ver. 33. And spitting, He touched his tongue. Christ wrought harmoniously, as though by His healing saliva He would moisten and loosen the dumb mouth, which was bound through drought.
Now He spat not upon the mouth of the mute, but upon His own finger, and by means of His finger applied the saliva to the mouth of the mute, as may be gathered from the Greek. This was required by propriety and decorum. Moreover, when Christ opened the ears and unloosed the tongue of the body, He opened also the ears and tongue of the soul, that they might listen to His inspiration, and believe that He was the Messiah, and that they might ask and obtain of Him pardon of their sins.
Tropologically: Every one ought to seek the same thing, and say with the Psalmist, "0 Lord, open Thou my lips, and my mouth shall show forth Thy praise" (Psa_51:17). We ought to do the same as regards our ears, that we may be able to sing aloud with Isaiah (Isa_1:4), "The Lord God hath given me the tongue of the learned, that I should know how to speak a word in season to him that is weary: He wakeneth morning by morning, He wakeneth mine ear to hear as the learned." Now this is done when He Himself with His own Finger, that is, the Holy Ghost (for He is "the Finger of God," Exod. viii. 19), and the spittle of Heavenly Wisdom, which is He Himself proceeding forth from the mouth of the Most High, touches the tongue of the soul.
Ver. 34. And looking up to heaven (because from thence come words to the dumb, hearing to the deaf, healing for all infirmities, says Bede), He groaned; both because He sympathised with the misery of the deaf and dumb man, as because in groaning He prayed and obtained healing for him from God.
Ephpheta, which is, Be thou opened, ie., which so signifies. "Where," says Bede, "the two natures of the one and the same Mediator between God and man are plainly set forth. For, looking up to heaven as man, He groaned, being about to pray to God; presently by a single word, as having the power of Divine Majesty, He healed." For we all have eyes, but the blind have theirs shut and closed, which in the Syriac idiom are elegantly said to be opened when their shutters are unclosed, as Angelus Caninius says (in Nom. Heb. c. 10). Moreover, the Heb. patach signifies to open. From whence is the imperative passive, or Niphal, hippateach, by crasis hippatach, for which the Syrians use Ephpheta, be open.
Ver. 36. He charged them that they should tell no man. This was not properly a command, involving a fault if disobeyed, but merely a token of urbanity and modesty, that, indeed, He might signify He would not make a parade of His miracles, or by their means obtain the vain glory of men. Wherefore they did not commit sin who nevertheless divulged them. Wherefore it follows, the more He charged them, so much the more a great deal did they publish it. "We are taught by this," says Theophylact, "that when we confer benefits we should not seek for applause therefrom; but when we have received benefits we should praise our benefactors, even though they are unwilling to be praised." And S. Augustine says, "By His prohibition the Lord wished to teach us how very fervently they ought to preach to whom He has given a command to preach, when they who were commanded to be silent could not hold their peace"
Ver. 37. He hath done all things well: Gr. καλω̃ς, i.e., beautifully, becomingly, harmoniously. Christ did nothing which the Pharisees or such like fault-finders could justly blame. Again, the Heb. for well is heteb, i.e., beneficently, because He gave hearing to the deaf, speech to the dumb. Indeed, Christ's whole life was one continuous beneficence. (Top)
And from thence He arose, and went into the borders of Tyre and Sidon, and entered into an house, and would have no man know it; but He could not be hid.25. For a certain woman, whose young daughter had an unclean spirit, heard of Him, and came and fell at His feet:26. The woman was a Greek, a Syrophenician by nation; and she besought Him that He would cast forth the devil out of her daughter.27. But Jesus said unto her, "Let the children first be filled: for it is not meet to take the children’s bread, and to cast it unto the dogs."28. And she answered and said unto Him, "Yes, Lord: yet the dogs under the table eat of the children’s crumbs."29. And He said unto her, "For this saying go thy way; the devil is gone out of thy daughter."30. And when she was come to her house, she found the devil gone out, and her daughter laid upon the bed.
After that the Lord had finished His teaching concerning food, seeing that the Jews were incredulous, He enters into the country of the Gentiles, for the Jews being unfaithful, salvation turns itself to the Gentiles. Wherefore it is said, "And from thence He arose, and went into the borders of Tyre and Sidon."
, Vict. Ant. e Cat. in Marc.: Tyre and Sidon were places of the Canaanites, therefore the Lord comes to them, not as to His own, but as to men, who had nothing in common with the fathers to whom the promise was made. And therefore He comes in such a way, that His coming should not be known to the Tyrians and Sidonians.
"and entered into a house, and would have no man know it." For the time had not come for His dwelling with the Gentiles and bringing them to the faith, for this was not to be, till after His cross and resurrection.
Or else, His reason for coming in secret was that the Jews should not find occasion of blame against Him, as if He had passed over to the unclean Gentiles. It goes on: "But He could not be hid."
But if He wished to do so and could not, it appears as if His will was impotent; it is not possible however that our Saviour’s will should not be fulfilled, nor can He will a thing, which He knows ought not be.
Therefore when a thing has taken place, it may be asserted that He has willed it. But we should observe that this happened amongst the Gentiles, to whom it was not time to preach; nevertheless not to receive them, when they came to the faith of their own accord, would have been to grudge them the faith.
So then it came to pass that the Lord was not made known by His disciples; others, however, who had seen Him entering the house, recognized Him, and it began to be known that He was there. His will therefore was that He should not be proclaimed by His own disciples, but that others should come to seek Him, and so it took place.
Having entered also into the house, He commanded His disciples not to betray who He was to anyone in this unknown region, that they, on whom He had bestowed the grace of healing, might learn by His example, as far as they could, to shrink from the glory of human praise in the shewing forth of their miracles; yet they were not to cease from the pious work of virtue, when either the faith of the good justly deserved that miracles should be done, or the unfaithfulness of the wicked might necessarily compel them. For He Himself made known His entry into that place to the Gentile woman, and to whomsoever He would.
Lastly, the Canaanitish woman came in to Him, on hearing of Him; if she had not first submitted herself to the God of the Jews, she would not have obtained their benefit. Concerning her it continues: "For a woman, whose daughter had an unclean spirit, as soon as she had heard of Him, came in and fell at His feet."
, Vict. Ant. e Cat. in Marc.: Now by this the Lord wished to shew His disciples that He opened the door of faith even to the Gentiles, wherefore also the nation of the woman is described when it is added, "The woman was a Gentile, a Syrophenician by nation," that is, from Syria and Phaenice. It goes on: "and she besought Him that He would cast forth the devil out of her daughter."
It appears however that some question about a discrepancy may be raised, because it is said that the Lord was in the house when the woman came, asking about her daughter. When, however, Matthew says that His disciples had suggested to Him, "Send her away, for she crieth after us," [ Mat 15:23 ] He appears to imply nothing less than that the woman uttered supplicating cries after the Lord, as He walked. How then do we infer that she was in the house, except by gathering it from Mark, who says that she came in to Jesus, after having before said that He was in the house? But Matthew in that he says, "He answered her not a word," gave us to understand that He went out, during that silence, from the house; thus too the other events are connected together, so that they now in no way disagree. It continues: "But He said unto her, Let the children be first filled."
The time will come when even you who are Gentiles will obtain salvation; but it is right that first the Jews who deservedly are wont to be called by the name of children of God’s ancient election, should be refreshed with heavenly bread, and that so at length, the food of life should be ministered to the Gentiles. There follows: "For it is not meet to take the children’s bread, and to cast it to the dogs."
, Vict. Ant. e Cat. in Marc.: These words He uttered not that there is in Him a deficiency of virtue, to prevent His ministering to all, but because His benefit, if ministered to both Jews and Gentiles who had no communication with each other, might be a cause of jealousy.
He calls the Gentiles dogs, as being thought wicked by the Jews; and He means by bread, the benefit which the Lord promised to the children, that is, to the Jews. The sense therefore is, that it is not right for the Gentiles first to be partakers of the benefit, promised principally to the Jews. The reason, therefore, why the Lord does not immediately hear, but delays His grace, is, that He may also shew that the faith of the woman was firm, and that we may learn not at once to grow weary in prayer, but to continue earnest till we obtain.
, Vict. Ant. e Cat. in Marc.: In like manner also to shew the Jews that He did not confer healing on foreigners in the same degree as to them, and that by the discovery of the woman’s faith, the unfaithfulness of the Jews might be the more laid bare. For the woman did not take it ill, but with much reverence assented to what the Lord had said.
Wherefore it goes on, "And she answered and said unto Him, Truth, Lord, but the dogs under the table eat of the children’s crumbs."
As if she had said, The Jews have the whole of that bread which comes down from heaven, and Thy benefits also; I ask for the crumbs, that is, a small portion of the benefit.
, Vict. Ant. e Cat. in Marc.: Her placing herself therefore in the rank of dogs is a mark of her reverence; as if she said, I hold it as a favour to be even in the position of a dog, and to eat not from another table, but from that of the Master himself.
Because therefore the woman answered with much wisdom, she obtained what she wanted; wherefore there follows, "And He said unto her, etc." He said not, My virtue hath made thee whole, but for this saying, that is, for thy faith, which is shewn by this saying, "go thy way, the devil is gone out of thy daughter." It goes on: "And when she was come into her house, she found her daughter laid upon the bed, and the devil gone out."
On account then of the humble and faithful saying of her mother, the devil left the daughter; here is given a precedent for catechising and baptizing infants, seeing that by the faith and the confession of the parents, infants are freed in baptism from the devil, though they can neither have knowledge in themselves, or do either good or evil.
Mystically however the Gentile woman, who prays for her daughter, is our mother the Church of Rome. Her daughter afflicted with a devil, is the barbarian western race, which by faith hath been turned from a dog into a sheep. She desires to take the crumbs of spiritual understanding, not the unbroken bread of the letter.
The soul of each of us also, when he falls into sin, becomes a woman; and this soul has a daughter who is sick, that is, evil actions; this daughter again has a devil, for evil actions arise from devils. Again, sinners are called dogs, being filled with uncleanness. For which reason we are not worthy to receive the bread of God, or to be made partakers of the immaculate mysteries of God; if however in humility, knowing ourselves to be dogs, we confess our sins, then the daughter, that is, our evil life, shall be healed.
If he desired to conceal himself, and could not, his will it seems was under control; but this is impossible. His will must always take place. On this occasion, therefore, he wished himself to be sought for by these Gentiles, but not to be made known by his own apostles. Wherefore it came to pass, that not the persons who were his followers, but the Gentiles who entered the house in which he was, published his fame abroad. (St. Augustine) --- Jesus Christ commanded his disciples not to publish that he was come into that country; not that he intended to cease from healing the infirm, and curing diseases, when he saw the faith of the inhabitants deserved it; for he informed the Gentile woman of his coming, and made it known to as many others as he thought worth; but that he might teach us, by his example, to decline the applause of men. (Ven. Bede)
This part, in which St. Mark says that Christ was in the house, when the woman came to petition in behalf of her daughter, seems to differ from the narration of St. Matthew, who says that the disciples besought Christ to dismiss her, because she cried after them; by which he signifies, that she followed them as they were on the road. These apparent differences may thus easily be reconciled. The woman came to our Lord when he was in the house, and he, according to St. Matthew, not answering her a word, went out during the silence: the woman followed after, and by her perseverance obtained her request. (St. Augustine)
24 And from thence he arose, and went into the borders of Tyre and Sidon, and entered into a house, and would have no man know it: but he could not be hid. 25 For a certain woman, whose young daughter had an unclean spirit, heard of him, and came and fell at his feet: 26 The woman was a Greek, a Syrophenician by nation; and she besought him that he would cast forth the devil out of her daughter. 27 But Jesus said unto her, Let the children first be filled: for it is not meet to take the children's bread, and to cast it unto the dogs. 28 And she answered and said unto him, Yes, Lord: yet the dogs under the table eat of the children's crumbs. 29 And he said unto her, For this saying go thy way; the devil is gone out of thy daughter. 30 And when she was come to her house, she found the devil gone out, and her daughter laid upon the bed.
See here, I. How humbly Christ was pleased to conceal himself. Never man was so cried up as he was in Galilee, and therefore, to teach us, though not to decline any opportunity of doing good, yet not to be fond of popular applause, he arose from thence, and went into the borders of Tyre and Sidon, where he was little known; and there he entered, not into a synagogue, or place of concourse, but into a private house, and he would have no man to know it; because it was foretold concerning him, He shall not strive nor cry, neither shall his voice be heard in the streets. Not but that he was willing to preach and heal here as well as in other places, but for this he would be sought unto. Note, As there is a time to appear, so there is a time to retire. Or, he would not be known, because he was upon the borders of Tyre and Sidon, among Gentiles, to whom he would not be so forward to show himself as to the tribes of Israel, whose glory he was to be.
II. How graciously he was pleased to manifest himself, notwithstanding. Though he would not carry a harvest of miraculous cures into those parts, yet, it should seem, he came on purpose to drop a handful, to let fall this one which we have here an account of. He could not be hid; for, though a candle may be put under a bushel, the sun cannot. Christ was too well known to be long incognito—hid, any where; the oil of gladness which he was anointed with, like ointment of the right hand, would betray itself, and fill the house with its odours. Those that had only heard his fame, could not converse with him, but they would soon say, "This must be Jesus." Now observe,
1. The application made to him by a poor woman in distress and trouble. She was a Gentile, a Greek, a stranger to the commonwealth of Israel, an alien to the covenant of promise; she was by extraction a Syrophenician, and not in any degree proselyted to the Jewish religion; she had a daughter, a young daughter, that was possessed with the devil. How many and grievous are the calamities that young children are subject to! Her address was, (1.) Very humble, pressing, and importunate; She heard of him, and came, and fell at his feet. Note, Those that would obtain mercy from Christ, must throw themselves at his feet; must refer themselves to him, humble themselves before him, and give up themselves to be ruled by him. Christ never put any from him, that fell at his feet, which a poor trembling soul may do, that has not boldness and confidence to throw itself into his arms. (2.) It was very particular; she tells him what she wanted. Christ gave poor supplicants leave to be thus free with him; she besought him that he would cast forth the devil out of her daughter, v. 26 . Note, The greatest blessing we can ask of Christ for our children is, that he would break the power of Satan, that is, the power of sin, in their souls; and particularly, that he would cast forth the unclean spirit, that they may be temples of the Holy Ghost, and he may dwell in them.
2. The discouragement he gave to this address ( v. 27 ); He said unto her, " Let the children first be filled; let the Jews have all the miracles wrought for them, that they have occasion for, who are in a particular manner God's chosen people; and let not that which was intended for them, be thrown to those who are not of God's family, and who have not that knowledge of him, and interest in him, which they have, and who are as dogs in comparison of them, vile and profane, and who are as dogs to them, snarling at them, spiteful toward them, and ready to worry them." Note, Where Christ knows the faith of poor supplicants to be strong, he sometimes delights to try it, and put it to the stretch. But his saying, Let the children first be filled, intimates that there was mercy in reserve for the Gentiles, and not far off; for the Jews began already to be surfeited with the gospel of Christ, and some of them had desired him to depart out of their coasts. The children begin to play with their meat, and their leavings, their loathings, would be a feast for the Gentiles. The apostles went by this rule, Let the children first be filled, let the Jews have the first offer; and if their full souls loathe this honeycomb, Lo, we turn to the Gentiles!
3. The turn she gave to this word of Christ, which made against her, and her improvement of it, to make for her, v. 28 . She said, " Yes, Lord, I own it is true that the children's bread ought not to be cast to the dogs; but they were never denied the crumbs of that bread, nay it belongs to them, and they are allowed a place under the table, that they may be ready to receive them. I ask not for a loaf, no, nor for a morsel, only for a crumb; do not refuse me that." This she speaks, not as undervaluing the mercy, or making light of it in itself, but magnifying the abundance or miraculous cures with which she heard the Jews were feasted, in comparison with which a single cure was but as a crumb. Gentiles do not come in crowds, as the Jews do; I come alone. Perhaps she had heard of Christ's feeding five thousand lately at once, after which, even when they had gathered up the fragments, there could not but be some crumbs left for the dogs.
See on Mt 15:1-20 .
The Syrophoenician Woman and Her Daughter ( Mr 7:24-30 ).
The first words of this narrative show that the incident followed, in point of time, immediately on what precedes it.
24. And from thence he arose, and went into the borders-- or "unto the borders."
of Tyre and Sidon-- the two great Phoenician seaports, but here denoting the territory generally, to the frontiers of which Jesus now came. But did Jesus actually enter this heathen territory? The whole narrative, we think, proceeds upon the supposition that He did. His immediate object seems to have been to avoid the wrath of the Pharisees at the withering exposure He had just made of their traditional religion.
and entered into an house, and would have no man know it-- because He had not come there to minister to heathens. But though not "sent but to the lost sheep of the house of Israel" ( Mt 15:24 ), He hindered not the lost sheep of the vast Gentile world from coming to Him, nor put them away when they did come--as this incident was designed to show.
but he could not be hid-- Christ's fame had early spread from Galilee to this very region ( Mr 3:8 ; Lu 6:17 ).
25. For a certain woman, whose young daughter had an unclean spirit-- or, as in Matthew ( Mt 15:22 ), "was badly demonized."
heard of him-- One wonders how; but distress is quick of hearing.
and fell at his feet:
26. The woman was a Greek-- that is, "a Gentile," as in the Margin.
a Syrophoenician by nation-- so called as inhabiting the Phoenician tract of Syria. Juvenal uses the same term, as was remarked by Justin Martyr and Tertullian. Matthew ( Mt 15:22 ) calls her "a woman of Canaan"--a more intelligible description to his Jewish readers (compare Jud 1:30 , 32, 33).
and she besought him that he would cast forth the devil out of her daughter-- "She cried unto Him, saying, Have mercy on me, O Lord, Son of David: my daughter is grievously vexed with a devil" ( Mt 15:22 ). Thus, though no Israelite herself, she salutes Him as Israel's promised Messiah. Here we must go to Mt 15:23-25 for some important links in the dialogue omitted by our Evangelist.
Mt 15:23 :
But he answered her not a word-- The design of this was first, perhaps, to show that He was not sent to such as she. He had said expressly to the Twelve, "Go not into the way of the Gentiles" ( Mt 10:5 ); and being now among them Himself, He would, for consistency's sake, let it be seen that He had not gone thither for missionary purposes. Therefore He not only kept silence, but had actually left the house, and--as will presently appear--was proceeding on His way back, when this woman accosted Him. But another reason for keeping silence plainly was to try and whet her faith, patience, and perseverance. And it had the desired effect: "She cried after them," which shows that He was already on His way from the place.
And His disciples came and besought Him, saying, Send her away; for she crieth after us-- They thought her troublesome with her importunate cries, just as they did the people who brought young children to be blessed of Him, and they ask their Lord to "send her away," that is, to grant her request and be rid of her; for we gather from His reply that they meant to solicit favor for her, though not for her sake so much as their own.
Mt 15:24 :
But He answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel-- a speech evidently intended for the disciples themselves, to satisfy them that, though the grace He was about to show to this Gentile believer was beyond His strict commission, He had not gone spontaneously to dispense it. Yet did even this speech open a gleam of hope, could she have discerned it. For thus might she have spoken: "I am not SENT, did He say? Truth, Lord, Thou comest not hither in quest of us, but I come in quest of Thee; and must I go empty away? So did not the woman of Samaria, whom when Thou foundest her on Thy way to Galilee, Thou sentest away to make many rich!" But this our poor Syrophoenician could not attain to. What, then, can she answer to such a speech? Nothing. She has reached her lowest depth, her darkest moment: she will just utter her last cry:
Mt 15:25 :
Then came she and worshipped Him, saying, Lord, help me!-- This appeal, so artless, wrung from the depths of a believing heart, and reminding us of the publican's "God be merciful to me a sinner," moved the Redeemer at last to break silence--but in what style? Here we return to our own Evangelist.
27. But Jesus said unto her, Let the children first be filled-- "Is there hope for me here?" "Filled FIRST?" "Then my turn, it seems, is coming!--but then, 'The CHILDREN first?' Ah! when, on that rule, shall my turn ever come!" But ere she has time for these ponderings of His word, another word comes to supplement it.
for it is not meet to take the children's bread, and to cast it unto the dogs-- Is this the death of her hopes? Nay, rather it is life from the dead. Out of the eater shall come forth meat ( Jud 14:14 ). "At evening-time, it shall be light" ( Zec 14:7 ). "Ah! I have it now. Had He kept silence, what could I have done but go unblest? but He hath spoken, and the victory is mine."
28. And she answered and said unto him, Yes, Lord-- or, as the same word is rendered in Mt 15:27 . "Truth, Lord."
yet the dogs eat of the children's crumbs-- "which fall from their master's table" ( Mt 15:27 ). "I thank Thee, O blessed One, for that word! That's my whole case. Not of the children? True. A dog? True also: Yet the dogs under the table are allowed to eat of the children's crumbs--the droppings from their master's full table: Give me that, and I am content: One crumb of power and grace from Thy table shall cast the devil out of my daughter." Oh, what lightning quickness, what reach of instinctive ingenuity, do we behold in this heathen woman!
29. And he said unto her-- "O woman, great is thy faith" ( Mt 15:28 ). As Bengel beautifully remarks, Jesus "marvelled" only at two things--faith and unbelief (see Lu 7:9 ).
For this saying go thy way; the devil is gone out of thy daughter-- That moment the deed was done.
30. And when she was come to her house, she found the devil gone out, and her daughter laid upon the bed-- But Matthew ( Mt 15:28 ) is more specific; "And her daughter was made whole from that very hour." The wonderfulness of this case in all its features has been felt in every age of the Church, and the balm it has administered, and will yet administer, to millions will be known only in that day that shall reveal the secrets of all hearts.
Deaf and Dumb Man Healed ( Mr 7:31-37 ).
The names in this passage are stranger than the translation lets on. Haydock notes that the Hebrew behind Astarthe is plural, as though the single goddess of the Sidonians were already a crowd of idols, and that the moon, the queen of heaven, is particularly meant — though Sanctius argued for Venus and Tirinus for Juno. Moloch he renders from the Hebrew as "their king," which the text flatly calls the abomination — the sun, Sanctius thought, or Saturn in Tirinus's reckoning. As for Chamos, Tirinus identifies him with Bacchus or Priapus, whom the Greeks called Komos because he presided over feasting, and adds the detail that fixes the tone: his worship was so shameful it was carried out at night. Calmet places the high place on the hill east of the city — of olives, Haydock supposes — which acquired for this reason the name the mount of offence; Abulensis and Salien reckon there were six such temples, one per nation among the wives.
The commentators refuse every available excuse. The obvious defence is that Solomon's idolatry was mere diplomacy, external conformity to keep peace in a foreign household; Calmet answers that those who excuse him this way in fact aggravate the crime, since a man who knows there is one God and bows anyway has sinned with his eyes open. Salien holds the worship was internal as well as external, Tirinus that he acted against his own better knowledge. The Fathers, Calmet notes, do not attempt to palliate any of it. Gregory says the wisdom that had been given him abandoned a heart which not even the discipline of the smallest tribulation had guarded; Augustine, that he began his reign with an ardent desire of wisdom, obtained it by spiritual love, and lost it by carnal affections; and, more devastatingly, that prosperity — always a severe trial for the wise — did him more harm than wisdom had done him good. Haydock, who dates the collapse to the end of a thirty-year reign begun in virtue, ranks him with Henry VIII, who also began well and ended in dishonour. Verse 9's own aggravation is that God had not left him to general principles: he appeared at Gabaon and again after the temple's consecration, and Abulensis adds the prophet sent during the building. Salien's summary is the bleakest sentence in the notes — no doubt priests and prophets often begged him to change, but the sinner is deaf until God speaks to his heart.
The detail worth carrying away is that Solomon was, in Salien's and Calmet's reckoning, about fifty when this happened, which is what scripture here means by old; Haydock counts the age as making it worse, not better. There is no version of this story in which the danger passes. The wisdom is genuine, the temple is built, the reign is a success, and the erosion comes afterwards and gradually, by way of affection rather than argument — which is why the modern form of it is so hard to notice, arriving as accommodation to people one loves rather than as apostasy. God's answer is a judgment held back: the kingdom will be torn, but not in his lifetime, and not entirely, for David thy father's sake (v. 12). Menochius sees why — David set this son on the throne, and the disgrace would rebound on him. What Solomon actually left behind stood on the hill facing the city. Tirinus notes that his shrines were not finally pulled down until the reign of Josias, generations of kings afterwards.