✠ daily readings

jump to a date

readings are available from 2025-01-01 through 2027-12-31.

search

search by feast, season, or scripture reference.

type to search…

←
Mon · Apr 27, 2026 · Eastertide

Monday of the 4th week of Easter

→
USCCB ↗

First Reading · Acts 11:1-18

1And the apostles and brethren, who were in Judea, heard that the Gentiles also had received the word of God.2And when Peter was come up to Jerusalem, they that were of the circumcision contended with him,3Saying: Why didst thou go in to men uncircumcised and didst eat with them?4But Peter began and declared to them the matter in order, saying:5I was in the city of Joppe praying: and I saw in an ecstasy of mind a vision, a certain vessel descending, as it were a great sheet let down from heaven by four corners. And it came even unto me.6Into which looking, I considered and saw fourfooted creatures of the earth and beasts and creeping things and fowls of the air.7And I heard also a voice saying to me: Arise, Peter. Kill and eat.8And I said: Not so, Lord: for nothing common or unclean hath ever entered into my mouth.9And the voice answered again from heaven: What God hath made clean, do not thou call common.10And this was done three times. And all were taken up again into heaven.11And behold, immediately there were three men come to the house wherein I was, sent to me from Caesarea.12And the Spirit said to me that I should go with them, nothing doubting. And these six brethren went with me also: and we entered into the man's house.13And he told us how he had seen an angel in his house, standing and saying to him: Send to Joppe and call hither Simon, who is surnamed Peter,14Who shall speak to thee words whereby thou shalt be saved, and all thy house.15And when I had begun to speak, the Holy Ghost fell upon them, as upon us also in the beginning.16And I remembered the word of the Lord, how that he said: John indeed baptized with water but you shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost.17If then God gave them the same grace as to us also who believed in the Lord Jesus Christ: who was I, that could withstand God?18Having heard these things, they held their peace and glorified God, saying: God then hath also to the Gentiles given repentance, unto life.

commentary

The charge brought against Peter in Jerusalem is not about doctrine. Nobody asks him what he preached at Caesarea or whether the Gentiles believed rightly; the question is why didst thou go in to men uncircumcised and didst eat with them? (v. 3). His answer is a story told with its numbers intact — the vessel let down by four corners (v. 5), the voice and refusal repeated until this was done three times (v. 10), the three men already standing at the door when the vision ended (v. 11), and these six brethren went with me also (v. 12), which is a count of witnesses rather than of companions. The whole defence turns on a piece of grammar in v. 9: the voice does not say that the creatures were always clean, but what God hath made clean, do not thou call common — a completed act, reported after the fact, which Peter can only describe and not authorize. Hence the form his conclusion takes, a question rather than a claim: who was I, that could withstand God? (v. 17).

Witham measures how much was at stake in the accusation. The Jews looked upon eating with uncircumcised Gentiles as a thing altogether abominable, and what disarmed them was nothing more elaborate than Peter's plain and sincere recital of the vision and of what happened at the house of Cornelius. The text names his opponents only as they that were of the circumcision (v. 2); Epiphanius supplies a name the narrative withholds, making Cerinthus — the next heresiarch after Simon Magus — the author of this dispute, the same man who later stirred the Jews against Paul, and the reason the first Council of Jerusalem was convened at all. Whether or not the identification holds, it registers something the passage itself implies: this objection did not die when it was answered here. Witham's note on the last verse marks what the objectors themselves conceded — they held their peace and glorified God that the gate of salvation was also opened to the Gentiles.

The passage rebukes the instinct to settle in advance whom grace may reach, and to make a boundary of practice into a boundary of salvation — the modern version is rarely about food, but it is often about who may be sat down with before they have been sorted out. It also rebukes the opposite reflex, of dismissing the objectors as merely narrow: they were defending something they had received, and they were answered by evidence, not shamed into silence. What the text requires is Peter's method — that a man who has watched God act says what happened, in order, with his witnesses beside him, and stops short of claiming the act as his own initiative. The scene ends not with a ruling but with a room going quiet: the men who had contended with him say nothing further, and the last thing recorded of them is that they glorified God.

· sources ·

The complete public-domain commentary this reading's note draws from, unabridged. Every claim in the note traces to a passage here.

First Reading Acts 11:1-18

Haydock Catholic Bible Commentary · Public Domain
11:2

Disputed against him. St. Epiphanius makes Cerintbus, who was the next heresiarch to Simon Magus, the author of this dispute. He likewise says it was he, who excited the Jews against St. Paul, (Acts xxi.) and that the first Council of Jerusalem was convened to condemn him. (St. Epiphanius, hæres. 28. chap. ii)

11:3

And didst eat with them. The Jews looked upon it as a thing altogether abominable, for them to eat with uncircumcised Gentiles; but St. Peter satisfied them, or silenced them by a plain and sincere recital of his vision, and of what happened at the house of Cornelius. (Witham)

11:18

They held their peace, and glorified God, that the gate of salvation was also opened to the Gentiles. (Witham)