✠ daily readings

jump to a date

readings are available from 2025-01-01 through 2027-12-31.

search

search by feast, season, or scripture reference.

type to search…

←
Sat · May 30, 2026 · Ordinary Time

Saturday of the 8th week of Ordinary Time

→
USCCB ↗

First Reading · Jude 17, 20b-25

No verses found for this reference.
commentary

Two of Haydock's philological notes here belong to verses the lectionary has cut away, and both are worth having. The apostles foretold trouble in novissimo tempore — en eschato chrono, which the note glosses "in this last age of the world" — and the men they foretold are animales, psuchikoi, formed ab anima — "sensual men," in Witham's rendering, "carried away, and enslaved by the pleasures of the senses." What Haydock adds to the second is a piece of history with a sting in it: "Tertullian turned Montanist, called the Catholics, Psychicos." The word stands in the epistle as a mark of discernment, and it left the epistle as a term of faction, aimed by a schismatic at the Church. Witham's summary of what these teachers actually do is unglamorous and specific: "scoffing and ridiculing all revealed truths, abandoning themselves to their passions and lusts," and separating "from the Catholic communion by heresies and schisms."

Against that, Witham reads building yourselves (v. 20) as a numbered foundation rather than a metaphor left vague: the structure is "founded 1. upon faith; 2. on the love of God; 3. upon hope, whilst you are awaiting for the mercies of God, and the reward of eternal life; 4. joined with the great duty of prayer." All four are footings; none is decoration. The instruction that follows is likewise a list, and it is the more interesting of the two because it refuses a single posture toward error. Witham finds "three sorts of persons" in vv. 22-23. Those "obstinate in their errors and sins" are "already judged and condemned" and are to be "sharply reprehended, reproved, and, if possible, convinced." Others are to be saved "by snatching them as it were out of the fire." And a third group — those drawn toward the heretics "through ignorance or frailty" — must be handled "more gently and mildly, with a charitable compassion." The hinge is what the hatred in v. 23 attaches to. Not the person: "the carnal coat, which is defiled, their sensual and corrupt manners, that defile both the soul and body." Man and coat come apart, and the whole calibration depends on the separation holding.

Which is why the doxology is not an ornament at the end of a scolding. The one addressed is "able to preserve you without sin and to present you spotless" — the same figure of clothing, now clean and not the disciple's own doing. Witham keeps the title open: the only God our Saviour "may either signify God the Father, or God as equally agreeing to all the Three Persons, who are equally the cause of Christ's incarnation and man's salvation." Haydock's own closing prayer draws the conclusion the modern reader is likeliest to resist, since the letter has just spent itself on correcting other people: "To whom, O Lord, can we give the glory of our salvation, unless to thee, to whom all is due? To whom can we consecrate our hearts, but to him who has redeemed them with his blood, sanctified them by his Spirit, and who is to make them happy by his glory? Reign there, O Lord, as on thy throne, now by thy love; that you may reign there hereafter with glory, magnificence, and sovereignty in heaven." The throne in question is not in the sanctuary but in the corrector's own heart.

· sources ·

The complete public-domain commentary this reading's note draws from, unabridged. Every claim in the note traces to a passage here.