✠ daily readings

jump to a date

readings are available from 2025-01-01 through 2026-12-31.

search

search by feast, season, or scripture reference.

type to search…

←
Sat · Jul 18, 2026 · Ordinary Time

Saturday of the 15th week of Ordinary Time

→
USCCB ↗

First Reading · Micah 2:1-5

1Woe to you that devise that which is unprofitable, and work evil in your beds: in the morning light they execute it, because their hand is against God.2And they have coveted fields, and taken them by violence, and houses they have forcibly taken away: and oppressed a man and his house, a man and his inheritance.3Therefore thus saith the Lord: Behold I devise an evil against this family: from which you shall not withdraw your necks, and you shall not walk haughtily, for this is a very evil time.4In that day a parable shall be taken up upon you, and a song shall be sung with melody by them that say: We are laid waste and spoiled: the portion of my people is changed: how shall he depart from me, whereas he is returning that will divide our land?5Therefore thou shalt have none that shall cast the cord of a lot in the assembly of the Lord.

commentary

The last clause of verse 1 is read three different ways by the versions, and the difference is not decorative. The Douay has the schemers execute their plans at first light because their hand is against God. The Chaldean reads the Hebrew as "has power" — they do it because their hand can. The Septuagint and the Arabic go the other way entirely: they have not raised their hands to God. Guilt by defiance, guilt by capacity, guilt by omission — and the same instability runs back through the verse, where what the Douay calls unprofitable the Septuagint renders "labours" and the Hebrew, Haydock notes, gives as "vanity, or an idol." Worthington supplies the sense that holds the Latin together: that is called unprofitable which is very detrimental. The word is not a shrug at futility; it names harm. And the timing is deliberate. Calmet glosses in the morning light as suddenly and with zeal — the plan turned over in bed at night is not slept off but executed at the first hour, briskly, by men who have been looking forward to it.

Verse 2 names the method, and Haydock gets under the Douay's oppressed: literally, calumniated. The seizure of fields and houses works by accusation before it works by force, as Jezabel did to Naboth (3 Kings 21:13) — the legal instrument first, the confiscation after. What follows is a punishment shaped like the crime. Micheas, the apparatus notes, saw the ruin of Samaria under Theglathphalassar and Salmanasar, so the very evil time of verse 3 was very near indeed. For verse 4 Calmet's reading is that the prophet writes the mournful canticle himself and puts it in Israel's mouth, a song running to verse 7 and composed in advance to show the certainty of the event; Menochius says the whole synagogue speaks it. Calmet also concedes, with a candour worth noting, that the passage is very difficult. Challoner takes the closing question as bitter sarcasm aimed at a false hope — how do you pretend to say that the Assyrian is departing, when in fact he is coming to divide our lands among his subjects? Calmet points to the Cutheans settled in the country afterwards (4 Kings 17:24), and Haydock records that the Septuagint flattens the question into a statement: there was none to hinder him from returning, our lands were divided.

The sentence in verse 5 is the exact reversal of the offence. Challoner: thou shalt have no longer any lot or inheritance in the land of the people of the Lord — the measuring cord that once assigned each family its share will not be cast for you, because, as Calmet says, strangers had taken possession. Men who acquired land by process lose land by process. The modern shape of this is rarely a night raid; it is the arrangement worked out in advance, technically defensible, executed promptly at nine in the morning, in which someone's house passes to someone with better counsel. Haydock closes his note by reaching for a pagan who felt the same wound, quoting Virgil's first eclogue: Impius hæc tam culta novalia miles habebit? — shall an impious soldier hold these fields, so well tilled? The lament is not for property. It is for the tilling, the years of work that made the ground worth taking, and for the cord that will never again be cast in the assembly of the Lord for the man who did it.

· sources ·

The complete public-domain commentary this reading's note draws from, unabridged. Every claim in the note traces to a passage here.

First Reading Micah 2:1-5

Haydock Catholic Bible Commentary · Public Domain
2:1

Evil. Septuagint, "labours." Hebrew, "vanity, or an idol." (Haydock) --- That is called unprofitable, which is very detrimental. (Worthington) --- Morning, suddenly and with zeal. (Calmet) --- Is. Hebrew, "has power," (Chaldean) "they have not raised their hands to God." (Septuagint; Arabic)

2:2

Oppressed. Literally, "calumniated," (Haydock) as Jezabel did Naboth, 3 Kings xxi. 13.

2:3

Time. It was very near. Micheas saw the ruin of Samaria, under Theglathphalassar and Salmanasar.

2:4

Say. The Israelites sing this mournful canticle to ver. 7., which the prophet composes for them, to shew the certainty of the event. It is very difficult. (Calmet) --- The whole synagogue speaks. (Menochius) --- Depart. How do you pretend to say that the Assyrian is departing, when indeed he is coming to divide our lands amongst his subjects? (Challoner) --- The Cutheans were sent into the country, 4 Kings xvii. 24. (Calmet) --- Septuagint, "and there was none to hinder him from returning, our lands were divided." (Haydock)

2:5

None. Thou shalt have no longer any lot or inheritance in the land of the people of the Lord. (Challoner) --- Strangers had taken possession. (Calmet) --- Virgil has the like affecting thoughts. (Eclogues i.) Impius hæc tam culta novalia miles habebit? (Haydock)