✠ daily readings

jump to a date

readings are available from 2025-01-01 through 2026-12-31.

search

search by feast, season, or scripture reference.

type to search…

←
Wed · Sep 9, 2026 · Ordinary Time

Saint Peter Claver, Priest

→
USCCB ↗

First Reading · 1 Corinthians 7:25-31

25Now, concerning virgins, I have no commandment of the Lord: but I give counsel, as having obtained mercy of the Lord, to be faithful.26I think therefore that this is good for the present necessity: that it is good for a man so to be.27Art thou bound to a wife? Seek not to be loosed. Art thou loosed from a wife? Seek not a wife.28But if thou take a wife, thou hast not sinned. And if a virgin marry, she hath not sinned: nevertheless, such shall have tribulation of the flesh. But I spare you.29This therefore I say, brethren: The time is short. It remaineth, that they also who have wives be as if they had none:30And they that weep, as though they wept not: and they that rejoice, as if they rejoiced not: and they that buy as if they possessed not:31And they that use this world, as if they used it not. For the fashion of this world passeth away.

commentary

Paul marks the status of his own words before he says anything else: "I have no commandment of the Lord: but I give counsel" (v. 25). What follows is not law. Then twice in one verse the word that governs the whole chapter returns — "this is good for the present necessity: that it is good for a man so to be" (v. 26). Cornelius a Lapide fixes on the Greek behind it, kalon, and refuses Erasmus's rendering of it as merely useful or expedient; with Theophylact he takes it to mean what is beautiful, exemplary and excellent — the moral and spiritual good that of itself conduces to victory over passion, to piety and to salvation. The clauses that follow turn on the same hinge. Paul does not say do not weep, do not buy. He says weep as though you wept not, buy as if you possessed not (vv. 30-31): the verbs all stand, and something is quietly subtracted from behind them. The reason comes last, and it is not moral but temporal — "the fashion of this world passeth away."

Lapide reads the chapter as Paul's reply to five questions the Corinthians had sent him by letter, and this passage answers the second: must those converted to Christ as virgins remain so? No, and the distinction matters — virginity is enjoined on no one as a precept and offered to everyone as a counsel, better than marriage for reasons Lapide sets out in order: the present necessity, since only a short time is given for a gain that is not temporal; the married man bound by the wedding-bond where the unmarried is unconstrained (v. 27); the tribulation of the flesh that the unmarried is spared (v. 28); and the undivided heart, where the married heart is split between God and a spouse. But Lapide, following Anselm and Ambrose, also records the flank Paul is defending on the other side: false apostles at Corinth despised marriage outright, pressing Christ's saying about eunuchs as though it bound every Christian. Hence Witham's weight on I spare you — Paul leaves them their liberty of marrying or not marrying and declines to discourage anyone by setting out the crosses of a married life. What keeps the counsel from becoming cruelty is Lapide's argument from grace: God does not advise a man to what is not in his power, and the single life is in no man's power unless his will is helped; therefore the grace has already been prepared, and whoever has its beginning will have its perfect ending, if he prays for it constantly and co-operates with it vigorously.

Estius takes the practical edge from v. 30: in the midst of our greatest afflictions we are not to let ourselves be overwhelmed with grief, but to recollect that this life is short and that temporary pains will be recompensed with joys that do not fade. The counsel cuts against both errors still on offer: the one that treats the unmarried as people waiting for their real story to begin, and the older one, now returning in secular dress, that treats marriage itself as a concession to weakness. Paul refuses both in half a sentence — "if thou take a wife, thou hast not sinned" — and asks something harder than either: that whatever is held be held with an open hand. The image he leaves is the buyer walking away from the stall with the goods actually his. The purchase is real. The title is good. And the ownership is already provisional.

· sources ·

The complete public-domain commentary this reading's note draws from, unabridged. Every claim in the note traces to a passage here.

First Reading 1 Corinthians 7:25-31

The Great Biblical Commentary of Cornelius a Lapide · Public Domain
7:1–35

CHAPTER 7

SYNOPSIS OF THE CHAPTER

In this chapter he answers five questions of the Corinthians about the laws of matrimony, and about the counsel of virginity and celibacy

i. The first question is whether matrimony and its use are lawful for a Christian, as being born again and sanctified. The answer is that they are lawful, and that, moreover, when either party demands his due, it ought to be given, and that therefore it is better to marry than to burn.

ii. The second is (

ver. 25) whether at all events those who are converted to Christ as virgins ought to remain so. He replies that virginity is not enjoined on any as a precept, but that it is on all as a counsel, as being better than matrimony for six reasons:

(a) Because of the present necessity, inasmuch as only a short time is given us for obtaining, not temporal but eternal gain: she that is a virgin is wholly intent in these things (

ver. 26).

(b) Because he that is married is, as it were, bound to his wife with the wedding-bond, but the unmarried is free and unconstrained (

ver.27).

(c) Because the unmarried is free from the tribulation of the flesh which attacks the married (

ver. 28).

(d) Because a virgin thinks only of what is pleasing to God, but one that is married has a heart divided between God and his wife (

Ver. 1.Now concerning the things whereof ye wrote unto me. In answer to the questions you have put to me about the rights, use, and end of matrimony and the single life, I answer that it is good for a man not to touch a woman. Notice here from S. Anselm and Ambrose that certain false Apostles, in order to seem more holy, taught that marriage was to be despised, because of the words of Christ (S. Mat_10:12), "There are eunuchs who have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake," which they interpreted as applying to all Christians, especially since the act of fornication, which had been so severely condemned by the Apostle in the preceding chapter, is physically the same as conjugal copulation. The Corinthians, therefore, asked S. Paul by letter whether Christians ought to be so chaste, and ought to be so much free for prayer, godliness, and purity as to be bound, even though married, to abstain altogether from intercourse with their wives.

It is good for a man not to touch a woman. It is beautiful, exemplary, and excellent. The Greek here is καλὸν. So Theophylact. Good is not here the same as useful or expedient, as Erasmus turns it, but denotes that moral and spiritual good which of itself conduces to victory over passion, to piety, and salvation (cf.

vers. 25, 35, 38, about the single life being counselled by God and Christ, who puts it before all men, and advises them to adopt it. But God does not advise a man to anything which is not in his power; but the single life is not in the power of each man, unless his will is helped by the grace of God. Therefore Christ has prepared, and is prepared to give to each one, this grace that is necessary to a single life and to virginity. If he is ready to give to each one virginal chastity, much more conjugal. Whoever, therefore, has his proper gift, that if his proper grace, in its beginning, will have it also in its perfect ending, if he will only pray to God earnestly and constantly to give him the grace prepared for him, and then co-operate vigorously with the grace that he has received.

ver. 25, where he says, "Now, concerning virgins, I have no commandment of the Lord, yet I give my judgment," which is identical with what he says here, "To the rest speak I, not the Lord."

If any brother hath a wife that believeth not. This is the third question put to Paul by the Corinthians: Can one of the faithful that is married live with an unbelieving partner?  S. Augustine and others, as I have said, connect these words with the preceding, which then give as the meaning: Although Christ permitted a believer to put away his wife that believeth not, yet I give as my advice that he do not put her away; for to put her away is neither expedient for her salvation nor for that of the children, if she is willing to live with a believer without casting reproach on her Creator and on the faith. Hence many doctors, cited by Henriquez (de Matrim. lib. xi. c. 8), gather indirectly by analogy that, since Paul forbids what Christ permits, one of the faithful that is married may, by Christ's permission, put away an unbelieving partner that refuses to be converted, and contract another marriage. On the contrary, when both are believers, neither is allowed this, as has been said. But if we separate these words, as the Roman Bible does, from the preceding, by a full stop, nothing if the kind can be proved. Nay, Thomas Sanchez (de Matrim. vol. ii. disp. 73, no. 7), who does not read any full stop, as S. Augustine does not, and so refers these words to what follows, thinks that all that is exactly to be gathered from this is that Christ permits to a married believer separation a toro, but not dissolution of a marriage entered into with one that believes not. In the third place, this passage might be explained to mean that Christ laid down no law on this matter, but left it to be settled by His Apostles and His Church, according to needs of different ages, as, e.g., the Church afterwards declared the marriage of a believer with as unbeliever null and void, if one was a believer at the time of the marriage. According to S. Augustine's reading, this rendering is obtained with difficulty; according to the Roman, not at all. For all that the Apostle means is that the believer is not to put away an unbeliever, if the latter is willing to live with the former. Cf. note to

Ver. 17. But as God hath distributed to every man, as the Lord hath called every one, so let him walk. I have said this much about the marriage of an unbeliever with a believer, and about separation and divorce, if the unbeliever seek for it, and about living together in peace; but I do not wish to be understood to mean that a divorce is to be sought for, or that peace is to be broken, merely through lust and a desire to change one's state, as, e.g., that a believer, because he is a believer and called to Christian liberty, may desire and find an excuse for changing his servile condition into one of freedom, his position as a Gentile into that if a Jew. I ordain, therefore, that each one of the faithful, whether he be a Jew or a Gentile, bond or free, maintain the state and condition which the Lord has given him, and which he had before he became a believer. Let each one walk in his own line; let him be content with that, and live as becometh a Christian; let him not grow restless to change his state because of his Christianity, and so cause the Gentiles to stumble.

This seems to be the answer to a fourth question put to Paul by the Corinthian