✠ daily readings

jump to a date

readings are available from 2025-01-01 through 2026-12-31.

search

search by feast, season, or scripture reference.

type to search…

←
Thu · Oct 8, 2026 · Ordinary Time

Thursday of the 27th week of Ordinary Time

→
USCCB ↗

First Reading · Galatians 3:1-5

1O senseless Galatians, who hath bewitched you that you should not obey the truth: before whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been set forth, crucified among you?2This only would I learn of you: Did you receive the Spirit by the works of the law or by the hearing of faith?3Are you so foolish that, whereas you began in the Spirit, you would now be made perfect by the flesh?4Have you suffered so great things in vain? If it be yet in vain.5He therefore who giveth to you the Spirit and worketh miracles among you: doth he do it by the works of the law or by the hearing of the faith?

commentary

A single letter has been fought over in v. 1. The Vulgate renders the Greek proegraphē as præscriptus, written beforehand or set forth; some Latin copies read proscriptus, proscribed, and the two pull opposite ways. Anselm takes the word as "disinherited" and Ambrose as "spoiled," meaning that Christ has been robbed of his lawful inheritance, the Church. Erasmus thought Augustine was invoking the legal doctrine of prescription — the rule by which possession after three years for movables and ten for immovables ripens into title — so that the Old Law, having held the name of the free law for centuries, had prescriptive right against Christ and shut him out of what was his. The best manuscripts show Erasmus misread him. Augustine wrote proscriptus, and glossed it: the Jews took away his inheritance and drove him out, which is proscription and not prescription at all.

Jerome takes præscriptus in its plain temporal sense: Christ's death was written beforehand, foretold by the prophets and in the sacraments of the old law. Witham reports the commoner view, that Paul means the preaching by which he had himself set Christ crucified before them. Lapide argues for a third and better sense — that Christ was placed before their eyes as by writing or a painting, so that a people who never stood at Calvary saw him hanging there, through preaching and faith, more clearly than the Jews at the foot of the cross. That reading gives the next question its force. The verb in who hath bewitched you can mean to envy, and Theophylact and Anselm hear exactly that: what Jew has begrudged you your gospel liberty? But it also means to fascinate, to bind the eyes so that they see what is not there or miss what is, and Lapide prefers this, since the spell was held to travel by the caster's fixed look — Virgil's shepherd complains that some eye is bewitching his tender lambs — while Jerome notes that the evil eye was thought most dangerous to infants and to those who cannot yet walk alone. Jerome is harder on the Galatians than anyone, cataloguing the vices provinces were reputed to have and reporting Ancyra in his own day torn among sects nobody else in the Roman world could even name. Lapide will not let this stand as contempt. Following Gregory, he calls the reproach a material rebuke and not a formal one, springing from charity and not indignation: parents who will use a thong on a son may the more freely use the tongue.

Theophylact catches Paul's grammar doing the argument's work. The apostle writes are you made perfect rather than do you make yourselves perfect, a passive that hints the Galatians were behaving like animals in letting themselves be circumcised by others; and he uses not the simple verb for completing but epiteleisthe, completing on top of — after being finished in Christ, are you looking for a further finish in the old law? A fifth wheel for the coach. Bernard finds the same shape in devotion itself, among those who burn through their strength in excessive prayer and penance, then slacken, and end consumed by the flesh they were fleeing, sensual at last from chasing their own health. That is what beginning in the Spirit and finishing in the flesh looks like when nobody is being circumcised. Against it stands the thing Paul says they already saw. Lapide calls the cross a book written in blood-red letters: open it, read the title, and in the wounds find not merely that love is written there but that it is engraved.

· sources ·

The complete public-domain commentary this reading's note draws from, unabridged. Every claim in the note traces to a passage here.

First Reading Galatians 3:1-5

Haydock Catholic Bible Commentary · Public Domain
3:1 · bibliography — editions & variants cited above

Before whose eyes Jesus Christ....crucified among you.[1] The common exposition is, that St. Paul had before described and set before them Christ crucified. Others, that it had been clearly foretold by the prophets that Christ was crucified for them. (Witham)

Præscriptus, Greek: proegraphe; not proscriptus, as in some readings of the Latin text: and in vobis is better understood to be joined with præscriptus than with crucifixus.

3:2

Did you receive the Spirit by the works of the law? As if he said, you esteem it a great favour to have received those spiritual gifts of working miracles, &c. When you were made Christians, had you these favours by the works of the law, or was it not by the hearing of faith, and by the faith of Christ, that you had such extraordinary graces? and when you have begun thus happily by the spirit of Christ and his spiritual gifts, are you for finishing and thinking to make yourselves more perfect by the exterior works of the law, the circumcision of the flesh, and such like ceremonies? (Witham)

3:4–5

If yet in vain: i.e. I have still good hopes, that what you have already suffered by persecutions and self-denials, since your conversion, will not be in vain; as they would be, if you sought to be justified by the works and ceremonies of the law of Moses, and not by the faith and law of Christ, by which only you can be truly sanctified. (Witham) --- St. Jerome, St. Augustine, and others, suppose that the power of working miracles still remained in the Galatians, notwithstanding what had passed; but St. John Chrysostom and several others, explain it of a power they had formerly possessed. (Calmet)