✠ daily readings

jump to a date

readings are available from 2025-01-01 through 2026-12-31.

search

search by feast, season, or scripture reference.

type to search…

←
Sun · Oct 25, 2026 · Ordinary Time

30th Sunday of Ordinary Time

→
USCCB ↗

First Reading · Exodus 22:20-26

20He that sacrificeth to gods, shall be put to death, save only to the Lord.21Thou shalt not molest a stranger, nor afflict him: for yourselves also were strangers in the land of Egypt.22You shall not hurt a widow or an orphan.23If you hurt them, they will cry out to me, and I will hear their cry:24And my rage shall be enkindled, and I will strike you with the sword, and your wives shall be widows, and your children fatherless.25If thou lend money to any of my people that is poor, that dwelleth with thee, thou shalt not be hard upon them as an extortioner, nor oppress them with usuries.26If thou take of thy neighbour a garment in pledge, thou shalt give it him again before sunset.

commentary

The death sentence in verse 20 is heavier in Hebrew than the Douay lets on. Where the Latin has shall be put to death, Haydock reports the Hebrew reading "shall be anathema," erom, a word that "denotes utter destruction both of the person and of his goods" (Jonathan, cited at 1 Kings xv. 3). Nothing survives the sentence, not even the estate. That detail sets up everything after it, because the rest of the passage concerns goods: a stranger's standing (v. 21), a widow's and an orphan's cry (v. 22-23), a poor man's loan (v. 25), a neighbour's garment held in pledge (v. 26). The law moves from the one offence that consumes a man's whole property to a series of offences committed through property, and the God who hears is the same in both. When the wronged cry out, the punishment is exact retaliation — your wives shall be widows, and your children fatherless — which Haydock reads plainly: "Thus God will retaliate upon the oppressors of the poor."

The commentators press hardest on verse 25. Menochius notes that the Hebrew word for usury "terms it a bite" — the loan does not merely cost, it takes flesh. Haydock then draws the conclusion a modern reader will resist: "Usury is not lawful, even with respect to the rich." The prohibition is not a means test attached to almsgiving; it is a judgment on the transaction itself, and that is where the passage's logic turns. Calmet reaches outside Israel to show how far the instinct runs: the Celts, he observes, put to death the murderer of a stranger while merely banishing the man who killed a citizen; and Cato, preserved by Varro, asked "What is usury... but to kill a man" — in a Rome that made thieves restore double but usurers fourfold. The lender is judged more severely than the thief. Calmet adds that restitution is prescribed at 2 Esdras v. 11, that the Jews themselves reprobated usury in any use, and that "some Calvinists have stood up in its defence, in opposition to the Scriptures, fathers, and Councils of the Catholic Church." Against all of it stands St. Leo's reframing of the creditor's position: "Let him who loves money... lend (in the persons of the poor) to Him who says, Give, and it shall be given to you." The poor man is not the borrower but the address; the creditor is God.

What this text forbids survives today less in the handshake loan between neighbours than in the machinery that has industrialized the bite — lending priced so the interest outruns the principal, built around people whose poverty is the collateral. Haydock's aside is the whole argument: the poor "are often most in want." They borrow because they must, and a rate defended as merely reflecting risk is defended by pointing at the desperation that created it. Nor does the passage stop at restraining the lender; with Luke vi. 35 in view, it tells him to lend "hoping to gain nothing by it." It closes not on a principle but on a piece of cloth. The pledge may be held, but not through the night: the sun going down on a poor man's garment in a richer man's house is itself the offence.

· sources ·

The complete public-domain commentary this reading's note draws from, unabridged. Every claim in the note traces to a passage here.

First Reading Exodus 22:20-26

Haydock Catholic Bible Commentary · Public Domain
22:20

Death. Hebrew, "shall be anathema," (erom) which denotes utter destruction both of the person and of his goods. (Jonathan) (1 Kings xv. 3.)

22:21

Were strangers. The Celtes punished with death the murderer of a stranger, which they only banished him who murdered a citizen. (Calmet)

22:24

Fatherless. Thus God will retaliate upon the oppressors of the poor. (Haydock)

22:25

Poor. Such are often most in want. Usury is not lawful, even with respect to the rich. The Hebrew terms it a bite. (Menochius) --- "What is usury, said Cato, but to kill a man." The Romans required thieves to restore double, but usurers were to render four times as much as they had taken. (Varro Rustic. i.) --- Restitution is prescribed, 2 Esdras v. 11. Some Calvinists have stood up in its defence, in opposition to the Scriptures, fathers, and Councils of the Catholic Church. Lend, hoping to gain nothing by it, Luke vi. 35. "Let him who loves money,.…lend (in the persons of the poor) to Him who says, Give, and it shall be given to you." (St. Leo, ser.) The Jews themselves have reprobated usury in any use. (Calmet)