✠ daily readings

jump to a date

readings are available from 2025-01-01 through 2026-12-31.

search

search by feast, season, or scripture reference.

type to search…

←
Fri · Nov 13, 2026 · Ordinary Time

Friday of the 32nd week of Ordinary Time

→
USCCB ↗

First Reading · 2 John 4-9

No verses found for this reference.
commentary

I found of thy children walking in truth (v. 4) has a small grammatical oddity in it that Lapide stops to name. The partitive "of thy children" is a Hebraism, of the same kind as the psalm verse where there shall be given to him of the gold of Arabia, and they shall worship of him means simply that they shall worship him. The Lady evidently had many descendants — Lapide thinks grandsons are included among the children — and John has met some of them. The verb matters more. He does not say the children were standing in the truth, or sitting in it, but walking, which Lapide takes as deliberate: they were making daily progress, going on from virtue to virtue, and are held up as models on that account. The commandment of v. 6 keeps the same image and turns it into an instruction — that you should walk in the same — so that the whole letter is addressed to people already in motion.

At v. 7 John pivots from charity to doctrine, and Lapide insists the little word for is doing real work. The command to keep walking in love is grounded on the fact that seducers have gone out, because truth and charity are inseparable sisters: men who overturn the one tear away the other as a consequence, drawing people out of union with Christ into what Lapide calls their own conventicles of Satan. Catharinus had already made the pair the substance of the greeting — the grace, mercy and peace John asks for consist in true doctrine and in sincere love, and the perfection of a Christian lies in those two things. Witham names the actual targets: the disciples of Simon, the Cerinthians, the Ebionites, all of whom refused to confess that Christ had come in the flesh. What Bristow draws from it is a rule of thumb rather than an argument — that a Christian walks in the faith and worship he received from the beginning, what we call the tradition of the apostles, and that this is how the faithful escape seducers who start up in every age teaching new doctrines. Haydock's note states the criterion at its bluntest. Once the apostles and their lawful successors have determined a disputed point and declared it, the faithful need no other mark of a false teacher than that he comes with a doctrine other than the one delivered.

The warning at v. 8 is about losing what has already been made, and Lapide notes that the Greek has it in the first person — lest we lose the things which we have wrought — so that the apostle counts his own labour in the loss along with theirs. His gloss on the full reward is unsentimental: a man who falls away and afterwards repents receives only half of it, having forfeited all the time and all the works of the years he spent apostate. Grace restores the man; it does not restore the calendar. The modern version of that forfeiture rarely announces itself as apostasy — it is the slow drift Lapide's verb at v. 9 describes, a word he glosses as transgressing, stepping over a line, while the Syriac renders it as merely passing by. Against both, the old saying he quotes stands as the sober measure: there is no greater unhappiness than to remember that we once were happy. And the tone in which all of this is urged is worth as much as the content. John, who could have written I command thee, O my daughter, writes instead I beseech thee, lady — a modesty Lapide holds up for imitation by anyone set over others.

· sources ·

The complete public-domain commentary this reading's note draws from, unabridged. Every claim in the note traces to a passage here.