✠ daily readings

jump to a date

readings are available from 2025-01-01 through 2027-12-31.

search

search by feast, season, or scripture reference.

type to search…

←
Fri · Apr 23, 2027 · Eastertide

Saint George, Martyr/Saint Adalbert, Bishop and Martyr

→
USCCB ↗

First Reading · Acts 13:26-33

26Men, brethren, children of the stock of Abraham, and whosoever among you fear God: to you the word of this salvation is sent.27For they that inhabited Jerusalem and the rulers thereof, not knowing him, nor the voices of the prophets which are read every sabbath, judging him, have fulfilled them.28And finding no cause of death in him, they desired of Pilate that they might kill him.29And when they had fulfilled all things that were written of him, taking him down from the tree, they laid him in a sepulchre.30But God raised him up from the dead the third day.31Who was seen for many days by them who came up with him from Galilee to Jerusalem, who to this present are his witnesses to the people.32And we declare unto you that the promise which was made to our fathers,33This same God hath fulfilled to our children, raising up Jesus, as in the second psalm also is written: Thou art my Son: this day have I begotten thee.

commentary

Paul's sermon ends by quoting a psalm and, to all appearances, getting its number wrong. The Douay has as in the second psalm also is written (v. 33), but Calmet notes that the oldest copy reads first psalm, and he treats the discrepancy as merely verbal: the division of the psalter "at present is very different from what it formerly was," a single psalm of ours sometimes broken into several, several of ours sometimes running together as one — and the Hebrews, he adds, "are not even now agreed among themselves on the same division of the psalms." Matthew Poole records the two explanations current in his day: that what we call the first psalm was originally a preface to the whole psalter, or that our first and second psalms once stood united. Nothing in Paul's argument turns on which is right, which is exactly Calmet's point. The verse is the same verse under either numbering.

What Paul does with that verse is the harder question. Thou art my Son: this day have I begotten thee is, Witham grants, a text that regards "chiefly the eternal generation of Christ" — that is how Paul himself deploys it at Hebrews 5:5 — and yet here it is produced to prove the resurrection. Witham's resolution is not that two unrelated senses are in play but that the second follows necessarily from the first: "the resurrection was a necessary consequence of his divinity, since death could have no power over him." The begetting is eternal; the rising is what that eternal begetting looks like when it meets a sepulchre. On this reading Paul is not offering the empty tomb as evidence that Jesus was divine so much as showing his hearers that Jesus was "their Messias, and the Son of God, begotten of his Father from eternity" — from which the rising follows as a consequence rather than as a surprise.

That inversion is worth sitting with, because the modern instinct runs the other way, treating the resurrection as the one astonishing exception, the single place where the ordinary rule was suspended. Witham's Christ does not overturn the rule; he was never subject to it. And the men in the story who came nearest to missing this were the ones with the texts open in front of them — those who heard "the voices of the prophets which are read every sabbath" and fulfilled them in the very act of not knowing them (v. 27). Familiarity with the words was no protection whatever. The scene the sermon keeps circling is the burial: having "fulfilled all things that were written of him," they took him down from the tree and laid him in a sepulchre (v. 29), completing the prophecy with their own hands and stopping there, as though the sepulchre were the end of the sentence.

· sources ·

The complete public-domain commentary this reading's note draws from, unabridged. Every claim in the note traces to a passage here.

First Reading Acts 13:26-33

Haydock Catholic Bible Commentary · Public Domain
13:33

He then shews them that Jesus was their Messias, and the Son of God, begotten of his Father from eternity, who rose from the dead, and he applies these words, (Psalm ii. 7.) to prove Christ's resurrection, thou art my son, this day have I begotten thee. It is true, these words regard chiefly the eternal generation of Christ, as they are applied by St. Paul, (Hebrews v. 5.) but the resurrection was a necessary consequence of his divinity, since death could have no power over him. St. Paul here also proves Christ's resurrection by the following predictions. (Witham) --- Second psalm. The oldest copy reads, first psalm. The difference is merely in words; for the division of the psalter at present is very different from what it formerly was: sometimes a single psalm of ours being divided into many, and many of our divisions making only one, according to the Hebrews. The latter are not even now agreed among themselves on the same division of the psalms. (Calmet) --- Some suppose, that what we call the first psalm was originally looked upon as a preface to the psalter; others, that our first and second psalms united in one. (Mat. Polus.)