✠ daily readings

jump to a date

readings are available from 2025-01-01 through 2027-12-31.

search

search by feast, season, or scripture reference.

type to search…

←
Fri · May 14, 2027 · Eastertide

Saint Matthias the Apostle

→
USCCB ↗

First Reading · Acts 1:15-17, 20-26

15In those days Peter rising up in the midst of the brethren, said (now the number of persons together was about an hundred and twenty):16Men, brethren, the scripture must needs be fulfilled, which the Holy Ghost spoke before by the mouth of David concerning Judas, who was the leader of them that apprehended Jesus:17Who was numbered with us, and had obtained part of this ministry.20For it is written in the book of Psalms: Let their habitation become desolate, and let there be none to dwell therein. And his bishopric let another take.21Wherefore of these men who have companied with us, all the time that the Lord Jesus came in and went out among us,22Beginning from the baptism of John, until the day wherein he was taken up from us, one of these must be made a witness with us of his resurrection.23And they appointed two, Joseph, called Barsabas, who was surnamed Justus, and Matthias.24And praying, they said: Thou, Lord, who knowest the heart of all men, shew whether of these two thou hast chosen,25To take the place of this ministry and apostleship, from which Judas hath by transgression fallen, that he might go to his own place.26And they gave them lot, and the lot fell upon Matthias, and he was numbered with the eleven apostles.

commentary

The passage opens and closes on the same verb. Judas "was numbered with us" (v. 17); at the end Matthias "was numbered with the eleven apostles" (v. 26). Between the two counts stands a gathering of "about an hundred and twenty" (v. 15) and a verse from the Psalms that Peter bends to a new target. Haydock notes that some Greek and Syriac copies read his habitation where the Douay has their, and, following Estius, that the psalm was written against the persecutors of Christ in general, while Peter applies it to Judas in particular (v. 20). The qualification for the vacant place is plain experience: a man who "companied with us" from John's baptism to the Ascension, which Witham glosses simply as "conversed with us" (v. 21). Judas, meanwhile, goes "to his own place" (v. 25), which Witham reads as the place of perdition "which he brought himself to."

Witham, citing Chrysostom, draws attention to the manner of Peter's acting. As chief of the apostolic college he had authority over them all and might, "without them, have chosen, and appointed a new apostle," Christ having told him to confirm his brethren; yet he consults them. Haydock puts the same point from the other side: Peter "acts and ordains in virtue of his supremacy, and the other apostles agree." The lot itself receives careful handling. Witham allows it only because both candidates were known to be fit, "every way qualified for the office." Haydock calls it an extraordinary method, inspired by God, which "can seldom or ever be imitated," and notes a practical benefit: where human judgment cannot prefer one worthy man to another, the lot spares the community the resentment of a party passed over. He closes with Augustine, for whom in a doubtful case a lot is no evil but a thing that, amid human uncertainty, points to the divine will: sors enim non aliquid mali est.

The commentators guard against two opposite mistakes. One treats authority as license to act alone, though Peter, who could have done so, chose to consult. The other treats chance as an oracle for any decision a group finds hard, which Witham's condition forbids: the lot comes only after the brethren have done their own sifting and set aside everyone unqualified, and Haydock doubts it should ever become a habit. What the text asks for is the order Peter kept: testimony first, then prayer to the One "who knowest the heart of all men" (v. 24), and only then the lot, falling on Matthias so that the broken number of the Twelve is whole again.

· sources ·

The complete public-domain commentary this reading's note draws from, unabridged. Every claim in the note traces to a passage here.

First Reading Acts 1:15-17, 20-26

Haydock Catholic Bible Commentary · Public Domain
1:15 · bibliography — editions & variants cited above

Peter, rising up, &c. Peter, says St. John Chrysostom[2] on this place, who was prince, or chief of the apostolical college, who had authority over them all, who by his place and dignity, might, without them, have chosen, and appointed a new apostle to succeed Judas, (Christ having said to him, confirm thy brethren,) &c. yet he consults them. (Witham) --- Here Peter acts and ordains in virtue of his supremacy, and the other apostles agree to his appointment.

St. John Chrysostom, Greek: om.g.tou chorou protos, &c.

1:20

His bishoprick. The words were prophetically spoken in the Psalms, of the traitor Judas. (Witham) --- Let their habitation. In some manuscript copies, in both Greek and Syriac, we read his. In the Psalms, the text was written against the Jews, the persecutors of Christ in general; but in this place, Peter applies it to Judas in particular. (Estius, in a different place.)

1:21

Came in, and went out among us. That is, conversed with us. (Witham)

1:25

To his own place of perdition, which he brought himself to. (Witham)

1:26

And he gave them lots, which they might lawfully do, when they knew that both of them were fit, and every way qualified for the office. (Witham) --- Lots. This method of deciding the election of ministers by lots, is one of those extraordinary methods which was inspired by God; but can seldom or ever be imitated. Where both candidates appeared equally worthy, as in the present case, and human judgment cannot determine which is to be preferred, it cannot be said that it was wrong to decide it by lots. Thus were avoided any of the evil consequences which might have happened by one party being preferred before the other. St. Augustine observes, that in a doubtful case, where neither part is bad, to decide by lots is not in itself wrong. Sors enim non aliquid mali est, sed res est in dubitatione humana divinam indicans voluntatem. (In Psalm xxx.) (Haydock)