✠ daily readings

jump to a date

readings are available from 2025-01-01 through 2027-12-31.

search

search by feast, season, or scripture reference.

type to search…

←
Sun · Aug 1, 2027 · Ordinary Time

18th Sunday of Ordinary Time

→
USCCB ↗

First Reading · Exodus 16:2-4, 12-15

2And all the congregation of the children of Israel murmured against Moses and Aaron in the wilderness.3And the children of Israel said to them: Would to God we had died by the hand of the Lord in the land of Egypt, when we sat over the fleshpots, and ate bread to the full: Why have you brought us into this desert, that you might destroy all the multitude with famine?4And the Lord said to Moses: Behold I will rain bread from heaven for you; let the people go forth, and gather what is sufficient for every day: that I may prove them whether they will walk in my law, or not.12I have heard the murmuring of the children of Israel, say to them: In the evening you shall eat flesh, and in the morning you shall have your fill of bread; and you shall know that I am the Lord your God.13So it came to pass in the evening, that quails coming up, covered the camp: and in the morning a dew lay round about the camp.14And when it had covered the face of the earth, it appeared in the wilderness small, and as it were beaten with a pestle, like unto the hoar frost on the ground.15And when the children of Israel saw it, they said one to another: Manhu! which signifieth: What is this! for they knew not what it was. And Moses said to them: This is the bread which the Lord hath given you to eat.

commentary

The food Israel will live on for forty years is named by a question. Seeing the white grains like unto the hoar frost on the ground, the people say Manhu! which signifieth: What is this! (vv. 14–15). Haydock notes that the gloss comes from Jerome and is "almost universally adopted," though some argue that man means "who" rather than "what," and Calmet answers them from Psalm 60. Button, cited by Haydock, admits that the Protestant rendering "It is manna, for they wist not what it was" seems "to make Moses guilty of a contradiction," whereas the Septuagint and Vulgate keep the original sense. The quails of v. 13 are solaem in all the Oriental languages, Calmet says, not pheasants or locusts, and Josephus places great flocks of them about the gulf of Arabia. Menochius says the bread fell round about the camp and not within it, "as the place was not sufficiently clean."

Calmet separates this manna from the natural kind found in Arabia. It fell every day except the sabbath for forty years, melted in the sun yet could be baked into cakes, and Wisdom 16:20 says it filled the mouths of God's servants with every delight, while the wicked of Numbers 11 were disgusted by it. He calls it "the bread of angels," brought by their ministry and such that angels "would desire nothing better" if they needed food. Worthington records that each man found he had a gomor whatever he had gathered, and what was kept overnight rotted, except the sabbath portion and the jar laid up in the ark. The test of v. 4, that I may prove them, lay in that daily gathering. Haydock then makes the argument the chapter sets up. The manna was "only a figure" of the bread Christ promised in John 6, and the figure must fall below the reality. If the Eucharist were mere bread, it would be less than the manna it is said to fulfil, and "mere bread cannot stand in competition with this miraculous food." He presses Zwingli and Calvin with it, since only the body and blood, soul and divinity of Christ can surpass what the fathers ate in the desert.

The chapter opens with grumbling that misremembers the past, when we sat over the fleshpots, and ate bread to the full (v. 3), which Haydock glosses as greedy feasting on the richest meats. Nostalgia for slavery and distrust of daily provision are the same fault, and God answers both with bread that cannot be hoarded. Worthington notes that the Eucharist likewise "giveth grace... in proportion to each one's disposition," contemptible to the wicked and delightful to God's servants. Israel had to go out each morning and stoop over the frost on the ground, gathering only the day's portion.

· sources ·

The complete public-domain commentary this reading's note draws from, unabridged. Every claim in the note traces to a passage here.

First Reading Exodus 16:2-4, 12-15

Haydock Catholic Bible Commentary · Public Domain
16:3

Over, greedily feasting on the most nutritive meats. (Haydock)

16:4

Prove. Show by experience. Therefore he orders the Hebrews to gather manna only for one day, except on Friday. Many suppose that this bread of angels began to fall on Sunday, (ver. 22; Origen, hom. 7.) or on Friday. (Calmet)

16:12

Say. Similar promises are often repeated, to appease the seditious mob. (Haydock)

16:13

Quails. All the Oriental languages express these birds by solaem, though some have asserted, that pheasants or locusts are here meant. Josephus (Antiquities iii. 1) informs us, that great flocks of quails are found about the gulf of Arabia. They return to Europe from the warmer regions, about the beginning of May, at which time God directed the course of vast multitudes to the camp of Israel. Hesychius says, the chennion, a smaller species of quails, was salted and dried, as the Hebrews did theirs, Numbers xi. 32. See Psalm lxxvii. 26. (Calmet) --- Dew, upon which lay the miraculous bread, around the camp. None fell within, as the place was not sufficiently clean. (Menochius)

16:15

Manhu. St. Jerome adds the explanation, (Du Hamel) which is almost universally adopted, though some pretend that man, even in Chaldean, means who, and not what? Calmet refers them to Psalm lx. 7, for a proof of the contrary. Manna is found in various parts of the world, the best in Arabia. But this was of a different nature, and wholly miraculous, falling every day, except Saturday, throughout the 40 years that the Hebrews dwelt in the desert. It melted with the heat of the sun, (ver. 21,) though it would bear the fire, and might be made into cakes, which cannot be done with the Arabian manna. It filled the mouth of God's servants with the most delightful tastes, (Wisdom xvi. 20,) while the wicked were disgusted with it, Numbers xi. 6. --- Our soul is dry, &c. It is called the bread of angels, being made or brought by their ministry, and of such a quality, that they would desire nothing better, if they stood in need of food. (Calmet) --- Whatever a man gathered, he had only a gomor full, and this sufficed for young and old, sick and healthy; if any was kept over the night it became corrupt, except that which was reserved for Saturday, and that which was preserved in the ark for a memorial for several hundred years. (Worthington) --- Yet this wonderful bread was only a figure of that which Jesus Christ promised to give, (St. John vi.) and as the figure must come beneath the reality, (Colossians. ii.) what we receive in the blessed Eucharist, must undoubtedly be something better than manna. Would Zuinglius and Calvin attempt then to persuade us, that Christ appointed their mere sacramental bread, to supersede and excel the favour of manna granted to the fathers, who are dead? Mere bread cannot stand in competition with this miraculous food. But the truth which it foreshewed, according to all the doctors of the Church, I mean the body and blood, soul and divinity of Jesus Christ, in the blessed sacrament, under the appearances of bread and wine, are surely more excellent than manna itself. It is miraculously brought upon our altars by the words of Jesus Christ, spoken by his priests at Mass, and dispensed to infinite multitudes, in the most distant places from each other, and even in the smallest particle. (Haydock) --- It giveth grace in this life, and glory in the next, and this in proportion to each one's disposition. To the wicked it may appear contemptible, but to the servants of God it is the most delightful and supersubstantial. (Worthington) --- Button allows that the Protestant version of this verse "seems to make Moses guilty of a contradiction. It is manna, for they wist not what it was. But the Septuagint (he might add the Vulgate also) translate it according to the original." (Haydock)