✠ daily readings

jump to a date

readings are available from 2025-01-01 through 2027-12-31.

search

search by feast, season, or scripture reference.

type to search…

←
Fri · May 8, 2026 · Eastertide

Friday of the 5th week of Easter

→
USCCB ↗

First Reading · Acts 15:22-31

22Then it pleased the apostles and ancients, with the whole church, to choose men of their own company and to send to Antioch with Paul and Barnabas, namely, Judas, who was surnamed Barsabas, and Silas, chief men among the brethren.23Writing by their hands: The apostles and ancients, brethren, to the brethren of the Gentiles that are at Antioch and in Syria and Cilicia, greeting.24Forasmuch as we have heard that some going out from us have troubled you with words, subverting your souls, to whom we gave no commandment:25It hath seemed good to us, being assembled together, to choose out men and to send them unto you, with our well beloved Barnabas and Paul:26Men that have given their lives for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ.27We have sent therefore Judas and Silas, who themselves also will, by word of mouth, tell you the same things.28For it hath seemed good to the Holy Ghost and to us to lay no further burden upon you than these necessary things:29That you abstain from things sacrificed to idols and from blood and from things strangled and from fornication: from which things keeping yourselves, you shall do well. Fare ye well.30They therefore, being dismissed, went down to Antioch and, gathering together the multitude, delivered the epistle.31Which when they had read, they rejoiced for the consolation.

commentary

The letter is addressed with unusual care: not to the church at Antioch but "to the brethren of the Gentiles" there and in Syria and Cilicia (v. 23). Witham takes the address as load-bearing. The decree regarded only those converts who had been Gentiles; Jewish believers are not forbidden the ceremonies of the law, and what the letter supplies is a declaration that the Gentiles are under no obligation to follow them. The charge it brings is equally precise. Against the men who had unsettled Antioch the apostles allege no doctrinal error at all, only a defect of commission — to whom we gave no commandment (v. 24). They went out from Jerusalem, Witham writes, and "pretended to speak our mind, and in our name, but we gave them no such commission." Haydock generalises it into a test, with Paul's question for a formula: quomodo prædicabunt nisi mittantur, how shall they preach unless they are sent.

What the council then claims for itself is stated in a phrase that has to be read carefully — it hath seemed good to the Holy Ghost and to us (v. 28). Witham glosses the "us" narrowly: to us in these matters, in which by the promises of Christ we are directed by the Spirit of truth. Haydock takes the wider view, that this is the first general council held in the Church "and the model of all succeeding ones," in which the apostles laid down law in a commanding and authoritative manner because they knew they had the right to. And yet the decree itself demonstrates the limits of what such authority is for. Witham, following Chrysostom, marks the abstention from blood and things strangled as necessary at that juncture but not a perpetual, unchangeable precept; Challoner is blunter, calling those things indifferent in their own nature, prohibited in order to bring the Jews more easily to accept the society of the Gentiles and to exercise the Gentiles in obedience, and adds that the prohibition "was but temporary, and has long since ceased to oblige." So a single sentence binds under the Holy Ghost, concerns matters that are morally neutral, and expires. The authority is real precisely where the subject-matter is not.

Two errors follow from taking half of that. The first is the unsent teacher, whom Haydock describes without hedging as the pattern of those "who go out from their own superiors, and pretend to teach and preach without any mission" — a description that now covers most public religious speech, which requires no sending at all. The second is the inference that because a discipline lapsed it was never binding, and that binding disciplines are an imposition on Christian freedom; Haydock puts the question polemically — by what spirit of seduction has the opinion spread that Christianity, "the very leading feature of which is to hear and to obey," authorizes unrestricted liberty? The answer the passage gives is not an argument but a reaction. Haydock notes that the consolation reached everyone, "not only the Gentiles, but the abettors and masters of the former dissension," because they received the decision as the resolve not of mere mortal men. The scene is a crowd assembled at Antioch, a letter read aloud in front of them, and a room that hears a rule imposed on it and is relieved.

· sources ·

The complete public-domain commentary this reading's note draws from, unabridged. Every claim in the note traces to a passage here.

First Reading Acts 15:22-31

Haydock Catholic Bible Commentary · Public Domain
15:23

The brethren of the Gentiles. Hence we see, that he letter, with the decree of the Council, only regarded those converts, who had been Gentiles; neither are they forbidden to use the Jewish ceremonies, but a declaration is made, that they have no obligation to follow the said ceremonies and precepts, as it will appear by other places. (Witham)

15:24

Some who went out from us, from Jerusalem, and pretended to speak our mind, and in our name, but we gave them no such commission. (Witham) --- A proper description of heretics, schismatics, and seditious preachers, who go out from their own superiors, and pretend to teach and preach without any mission, et quomodo prædicabunt nisi mittantur; how can they preach, unless they are sent? (Romans x. 15.)

15:28

It hath seemed good to the Holy Ghost, and to us. To us in these matters, wherein by the promises of Christ, we are directed by the Holy Ghost, the spirit of truth, &c. --- Than these necessary things. Necessary at this juncture, and always, if we except that order of abstaining from blood, and things strangled, which was not a perpetual, unchangeable precept, but to last only for a time, as St. John Chrysostom observes. (Witham) --- This is the first general council held in the Church, and the model of all succeeding ones. In it the apostles, in a commanding and authoritative manner, laid down the law, which was to be the guide of the faithful, knowing they had a right to impose any regulations in the Church, and that they could not employ this authority but to good purposes, directed as they were by the unerring spirit of truth, which Christ had promised (Matthew xxviii. 20.) should remain with his Church for ever. Hence it would appear that we have no more ground refusing obedience to the voice of the Church at present, than at her first establishment: and that those who will not hear the Church now, speaking in her Councils, would with as little ceremony have opposed the apostles on this occasion, had they lived at the time. By what spirit of seduction has been introduced, and spread, to such an alarming extent, the opinion, that Christianity (the very leading feature of which is to hear and to obey) authorizes unrestricted liberty? Is then authority an unmeaning word? (Haydock)

15:29

From blood, and from things strangled. The use of these things, though of their own nature indifferent, were here prohibited, to bring the Jews more easily to admit of the society of the Gentiles; and to exercise the latter in obedience. But this prohibition was but temporary, and has long since ceased to oblige; more especially in the western churches. (Challoner) --- See note on ver. 20, above.

15:31

We may here briefly remark, that the controversy was finally adjusted by the decree of the Council. 2ndly, That all, not only the Gentiles, but the abettors and masters of the former dissension, experienced great consolation in the promulgation of the decision, receiving it as the resolve not of mere mortal men, but of the Holy Ghost. It hath seemed good to the Holy Ghost and to us.