✠ daily readings

jump to a date

readings are available from 2025-01-01 through 2027-12-31.

search

search by feast, season, or scripture reference.

type to search…

←
Sat · May 9, 2026 · Eastertide

Saturday of the 5th week of Easter

→
USCCB ↗

First Reading · Acts 16:1-10

1And he came to Derbe and Lystra. And behold, there was a certain disciple there named Timothy, the son of a Jewish woman that believed: but his father was a Gentile.2To this man the brethren that were in Lystra and Iconium gave a good testimony.3Him Paul would have to go along with him: and taking him, he circumcised him, because of the Jews who were in those places. For they all knew that his father was a Gentile.4And as they passed through the cities, they delivered unto them the decrees for to keep, that were decreed by the apostles and ancients who were at Jerusalem.5And the churches were confirmed in faith and increased in number daily.6And when they had passed through Phrygia and the country of Galatia, they were forbidden by the Holy Ghost to preach the word in Asia.7And when they were come into Mysia, they attempted to go into Bithynia: and the Spirit of Jesus suffered them not.8And when they had passed through Mysia, they went down to Troas.9And a vision was shewed to Paul in the night, which was a man of Macedonia standing and beseeching him and saying: Pass over into Macedonia and help us.10And as soon as he had seen the vision, immediately we sought to go into Macedonia: being assured that God had called us to preach the gospel to them.

commentary

Two consecutive verses appear to cancel each other. In v. 3 Paul circumcises Timothy because of the Jews who were in those places; in v. 4 he goes from city to city delivering the decrees of the apostles and ancients at Jerusalem — the decrees whose whole point was that Gentile converts need not be circumcised. Haydock does not smooth the seam over. Witham's reading is that the ceremonies of the old law were at this moment still lawful, though the obligation to keep them had ceased: a thing may be permitted long after it has stopped being required. Tirinus puts the motive more bluntly — Paul did it to gain the Jews and to make Timothy acceptable to them, on the principle he states himself, to the Jew I became a Jew, that I might gain the Jews. Augustine, writing to Jerome, supplies the sharpest form of the argument by setting this against the opposite case: Paul had refused to circumcise Titus, precisely to vindicate the Christian's independence of the Mosaic rites, and now submits to one, to show there is nothing bad in the rites themselves and that they might be practised without crime until time by degrees abolished them. What looks like inconsistency is two halves of a single point about what has ended and what has merely been outgrown.

The second half of the reading raises a harder question, and the commentators Haydock gathers do not answer it with one voice. Twice the apostles are stopped: forbidden by the Holy Ghost to preach in Asia (v. 6), then not suffered by the Spirit of Jesus to enter Bithynia (v. 7). Witham's suggestion is one of urgency — the preaching in Macedonia was simply more necessary at that moment. Menochius offers two quite different explanations: that those provinces were not yet prepared to receive the gospel, or that they were being held in reserve, Asia for John and Bithynia for Luke. Leo declines to answer at all, and files the question with the ones that admit of no answer: why the Son of God did not come ages earlier, why so many died in ignorance, why within one family one believes and another stays in the dark. Underneath the disagreement, Witham draws a point from the wording that is not in dispute. The agent forbidding in v. 6 and the agent forbidding in v. 7 are named differently and are the same: the Holy Ghost is the Spirit of Jesus, as proceeding from the Son no less than from the Father.

The temptation is to read a blocked route as a failure of nerve or of planning, and to read an open one as vindication. This passage will not support either. The apostles are not shown deliberating and choosing well; they are shown being turned aside twice and then given a destination they had not considered. What is asked is the willingness to be redirected without being told why — Leo's list of unanswered questions is not a lament but a boundary, and the man who insists on the reason before he moves has made his own comprehension the condition of obedience. Note where the reading finally lands: a figure standing in the night, beseeching, asking for help, and a narrator who from the next verse onward writes we. The one who is stopped and turned is also the one who ends up inside the story rather than beside it.

· sources ·

The complete public-domain commentary this reading's note draws from, unabridged. Every claim in the note traces to a passage here.

First Reading Acts 16:1-10

Haydock Catholic Bible Commentary · Public Domain
16:3

Circumcised him. Not to obstruct the conversion of the Jews; and because it was still lawful to observe the Jewish ceremonies, though the obligation of keeping the old law had ceased. (Witham) --- This St. Paul did in order to gain the Jews, and make Timothy acceptable to them. (Tirinus) --- To the Jew, says he, (1 Corinthians ix. 20.) I became a Jew, that I might gain the Jews. If he refused to circumcise Titus, in order to vindicate the Christian's independence of the Mosaic ceremonies; he now submits to the observance of them, to shew there is nothing of itself bad in them, and that they might without crime be practised, till time by degrees had abolished them. (St. Augustine, ep. lxxxii. ad S. Hieronymum. [to St. Jerome.])

16:4

Here, as well as in the last verse of the former chapter, we see St. Paul ordering the new converts, wherever he went, to receive, as their rule of conduct, the ordinances of the apostles and priests assembled in Jerusalem.

16:6

They were forbidden by the Holy Ghost, to go, and preach at that time in the Lesser Asia [Asia Minor], perhaps because their preaching in Macedonia was more necessary; or because St. John was to be sent into Asia [Asia Minor]. (Witham) --- Forbidden. Why? Because they were not yet prepared to receive the gospel; or, perhaps, these provinces were reserved for St. John, as Bithynia was for St. Luke. (Menochius) --- St. Leo compares this question to many others respecting the inscrutable judgments of God. Why did not the Son of God come into the world may ages before? Why did he suffer so many to die in ignorance? Why are there yet so many in infidelity? Why, in one family, does one believe and is converted, while another remains in darkness, and crime? Who shall account for the exercise he pleases to make of his rigour, or his mercy, when all were justly victims of the former? (St. Leo, de vocat. Gentium. lib. ii. chap. 2)

16:7

The spirit of Jesus permitted them not. It is the same spirit, which just before was called the Holy Ghost: for the Holy Ghost is the spirit of Jesus, as proceeding from the Son as well as from the Father. (Witham)

16:9

A vision, &c. The tutelar angel of the province, according to most interpreters, under the form of a Macedonian, who implored St. Paul in behalf of the province he guarded.

16:10

We. This change in the narration from the third, to the first person, we sought, &c. is remarkable. It is hence inferred, that St. Luke, the author of this book, joined St. Paul at Troas, and became his inseparable companion. (Calmet) --- It is, however, probable, that as the narrative in the first person changes again at the end of this chapter, and is not resumed, till the fifth verse of the 20th chapter, that St. Luke was absent on some mission during the time that elapsed between this and their sailing from Philippi, as mentioned hereafter. (Chap. xx. ver. 6) (Tirinus)